|
|
|
|
|
Romy the Cat has found another room. I’ve started a new fiction project under my name, Roman Bessnow. The new work is at MutationsBook.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Romy the Cat's
personal site dedicated to advanced audio and evolved music reproduction
techniques
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
I am somewhat familiar with the dact: I used it in non controlled manner but familiar environment; it was assembled by someone else who also provided the necessary power supply; it was in two chassis about 15x15x~30 cm each (one for ps), so the equal...
|
|
While Dima and I were thinking how to get out of our 7788-7721 80dB gain, a visitor in reply to my inquiry above about a “second-type” phonostage sent me a link that make me very much queries. He suggested looking at DACT CT-100 phono module. It is r...
|
|
probably not for 16R...http://www.dact.com/html/attenuators.html;and of course there is Guy Hammel...Paul S...
|
|
While Dima and I were thinking how to get out of our 7788-7721 80dB gain, a visitor in reply to my inquiry above about a “second-type” phonostage sent me a link that make me very much queries. He suggested looking at DACT CT-100 phono module. It is r...
|
|
I am somewhat familiar with the dact: I used it in non controlled manner but familiar environment; it was assembled by someone else who also provided the necessary power supply; it was in two chassis about 15x15x~30 cm each (one for ps), so the equal...
|
|
Thanks, Gregm.
My primary concern with all those IC-based phonostages is that they are thin like hell. The audio freaks like it, I do not. I never heard the DACT CT-100 and can not speculate. I have seen this one:
http://www.goodsoundclub.com/PDF/D...
|
|
This appears to put the internal values of its gain stages into play, which in turn appears to cut the signal path parts count, all right. Since we are not given the (presumed "dedicated") cartridge H, did anyone run reverse numbers to see if this p...
|
|
[quote user="Paul S"]How do I hate DIY? Let me count the ways...[/quote]I hate it just as much! Paul, thanks, but most of what you are talking about has been already addressed and described. Perhaps not very visible frommy pictures but I'm a very poo...
|
|
I am with you on this one. I am also very suspicious of gigantic, 4-chassis phono stages if only because I just wonder why the need for all those damn noisy parts, along with concommitment connections?So it really pisses me off to admit that th...
|
|
How do I hate DIY? Let me count the ways...Is there some reason you cannot make through-holes to facilitate soldering leads to your copper sheet? Use a hot iron (800 F) and plenty of aggressive flux to pre-tin the holes... Stand parts on short leads...
|
|
For some time I have felt that most audiophile phono stages are over-built, especially those pretending to be thought-out, "no-compromise" designs. Ironically, it seems to me that few (or none) of the "thought-out" designs I have seen and/or heard a...
|
|
|
|
|
All context of this site except the Forum's posts
Copyright © Roman Bessnow 2004-2026
All messages within the Site’s Forum Copyright © by
authors of the posts
|
|
Last 24-hours posts: |
0 |
|
 |
|
|
Total human visitors: |
65,484,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|