| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Didital Things » The commercial music servers. (37 posts, 2 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 2 of 2 (37 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Digital recorders: what the "big boys" use?..  Converters comparation....  Didital Things  Forum     15  131045  01-05-2005
  »  New  How to record FM broadcasts...  Left to center...  Off Air Audio Forum     125  1141978  11-04-2005
  »  New  The best practices for DAW Data Storage...  The Time Stamps Directories Synchronizer...  Didital Things  Forum     9  79432  09-24-2007
  »  New  Recording options: Pacific Microsonics vs. Lavry Gold...  Pacific Microsonics vs. Lavry Gold in D/A mode....  Didital Things  Forum     24  275332  09-27-2007
  »  New  Better DAW by a “second” echelon of digital efforts?..  Better DAW by a “second” echelon of digital efforts?...  Didital Things  Forum     0  17079  10-08-2007
  »  New  Reference Recordings “digital master” and Berkeley's ne..  The Berkeley Audio DAC’s processor....  Didital Things  Forum     13  194656  01-17-2008
  »  New  New sample 24/96 downloads from HDTT..  Or shall I say will you bat?...  Didital Things  Forum     20  156555  02-10-2008
  »  New  High Quality Music Server / CD player..  At What Point Does Corruption Occur?...  Didital Things  Forum     169  1132661  09-14-2008
  »  New  A lucidly implemented digital?..  A lucidly implemented digital?...  Didital Things  Forum     0  18546  11-18-2008
  »  New  To Rip or not to Rip...  Ripping with better playback...  Didital Things  Forum     2  34617  03-18-2009
  »  New  The contra-ridicules solution for a good DAW?..  Happy to see this thread...  Didital Things  Forum     1  33470  06-18-2009
  »  New  Weiss Engineering DAC202..  Attenuation...  Didital Things  Forum     5  54319  06-21-2010
  »  New  Why I hate computer playback...  Higher power cpu...  Didital Things  Forum     17  132272  04-16-2012
  »  New  Analog vs. Digital... without BS...  Are we comparing anything except our own prejudices?...  Didital Things  Forum     23  183357  04-15-2009
  »  New  Recording/Playback software..  Free stuff...  Didital Things  Forum     14  106008  08-24-2008
02-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 21
Post ID: 6623
Reply to: 6621
The firewire controllers.
 Telstar wrote:
I meant that the Lynx digital output may retain some noise from the computer, not that you get noise from the onboard soundcard (provided that you have one -You have onboard audio disabled in the bios, have you?)
OK, I will look in that firewire thing sometimes, I know little about it as now. Is quality of firewire controller important? Can I use my on-board firewire? Regarding the onboard audio disabled in bios – nope, I did not do it. The WaveLab that I use for recording and for has a configuration that allows selecting which audio devise is used. The Lynx care is listed then along with Windows default sound devise – I just do not use system default sound cards. I did deactivate on my other DAW the onboard audio and I’ve seen no difference in sound.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
02-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Telstar
Posts 30
Joined on 02-06-2008

Post #: 22
Post ID: 6624
Reply to: 6623
The controller matters too
 Romy the Cat wrote:

OK, I will look in that firewire thing sometimes, I know little about it as now. Is quality of firewire controller important? Can I use my on-board firewire? Regarding the onboard audio disabled in bios – nope, I did not do it. The WaveLab that I use for recording and for has a configuration that allows selecting which audio devise is used. The Lynx care is listed then along with Windows default sound devise – I just do not use system default sound cards. I did deactivate on my other DAW the onboard audio and I’ve seen no difference in sound.


In general, the more things that you dont use are disabled (from bios or from windows), the better Smile

Yep the controller matters: it should have a texas instruments chip, otherwise, buy a granite controller for 80$ to put in a pci slot.
02-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
el`Ol
Posts 225
Joined on 10-13-2007

Post #: 23
Post ID: 6633
Reply to: 6621
Wordclock
 Telstar wrote:
 Since the Lavry has a master clock, you should look into firewire devices that have a word clock input. I'm not sure about the Fireface, but the MOTU should have that.


Why an external device? There are interface cards with wordclock I/O.
02-13-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
el`Ol
Posts 225
Joined on 10-13-2007

Post #: 24
Post ID: 6635
Reply to: 6633
Laptop as frontend

If the laptop as a frontend is really that important, this would be my choice:

http://www.rme-audio.de/en_products_digiface.php

02-23-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 25
Post ID: 6756
Reply to: 6319
Now, the Memory Player

I have no idea what it is, never see or heard it, – juts to toss the thing in the basket of ideas. It also came from Clark Johnsen – with all my tremendous respect to Clark in music domain I do not take too seriously Clark “movements” in digital audio fields.

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue35/cj_diaries.htm

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
02-26-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 26
Post ID: 6788
Reply to: 6623
Another might be interesting option: Weiss new DACA

Many companies recently began to offer options for raw VAW-players – that God. I hope the CD/DVD.SACD all will die and go to hell. Playing the row files is the way to do. Even the raw 16/44 VAW is so far beyond then any crap put in disk that it is not funny.

Anyhow, Weiss juts jointed the list of the pro companies that offer the VAW-orientated DAC.

http://www.designwsound.com/public/minerva-brochure.pdf 

The Weiss new "Minerva" DAC supports firewire and it look like the dealers do promote firewire. This new Weiss might be an interesting new little machine.

Weiss is very good company generally and the do very reputed pro digital equipment. Their digital EQ pretty much universally considered the best in the industry. This Weiss ADC should be very good, I never had it but it should similar in quality to Lavry AD-122. Weiss does DACs, on commercial and one professional. It has a good reputation, although my exposure to it did not convince me to use it (despite that a friend of mine was Weiss distributor), though I did not try it in my own playback. The Weiss CD passport was pretty bad, very very bad. I have no idea or it was an accident or it was a some kind of sign. The new Daniel Weiss VAW DAC might be anything: good or bad. We will see soon what the big digital companies make for VAW-DACs. Another year and all more or less serious companies will have similar options. Let see what the times brings. For now, the Weiss Minerva looks like out there…

Rgs, Romy the Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
02-26-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Telstar
Posts 30
Joined on 02-06-2008

Post #: 27
Post ID: 6790
Reply to: 6788
Minerva Cost
 Romy the Cat wrote:
The Weiss new "Minerva" DAC supports firewire and it look like the dealers do promote firewire. This new Weiss might be an interesting new little machine.


Oh, this seems a very interesting product.
Weiss is also known for its high prices. Let's see how much will cost the Minerva...
02-27-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,664
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 28
Post ID: 6796
Reply to: 6790
Blink, stretch, yawn... A step forward???
Well if they do come up with transferable/store-able/playable RAW, this might finally get me off my ass.

But wait....

First, we need material...

... back to sleeeeep.....


Paul S
07-28-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 29
Post ID: 7924
Reply to: 6319
The stupid popularity of music servers

What astonishes me is that industry discover a new “gold manna” the music servers but never told to people what to do with them and how to use. The list of the companies the tosses on market music servers are growing. Many companies do 24 bit dacs with obvious aim to music severs. However, the industry still does not allow people’s access to live feeds – the only sources worth of use of music servers to begin with. The industry morons not try to fill the space on the sold music servers with pre-caned tape and LP transfers but it is truly laughable…

I think the audio access to live performances is the key. I use FM but it might not be ONLY FM. Without having access to live music feeds and without being able to record the result how the hell people would know if their music servers wroth any time and efforts? It reminds me a story as a guy instating a traffic light on an island that has the only one street and not intersections…

Rgs, Romy the caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
10-13-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 30
Post ID: 8499
Reply to: 6319
The damn music servers at RMAF 2008

At his RMAF 2008 Show Report the “Enjoy the Music.com’s” writer Steva-Rochlin-Goat-Killa wrote:

“It is good to see more rooms using music stored on a computer as their source. Of course vinyl notwithstanding, which can sound incredible, if you must use digital i feel that music servers and the like will soon take over the marketplace. This room had the VRS music server system."

 I read it as ask the rhetorically-ebonic question: “…and what the fuck people play on those music server”. As I said before the situation with music server in my view is ridicules - the industry pushes music servers, people keep building them but what people can do with them? Copy inferior CDs and CVD to them? Copy LP and tapes to them? Truly ridicules to promote this use of music servers as advantage.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
10-14-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
serenechaos
lost alamos
Posts 86
Joined on 12-01-2007

Post #: 31
Post ID: 8512
Reply to: 8499
Music on servers @ RMAF 2008
fiogf49gjkf0d
Yes and No...
Yes, I saw/heard some exhibitors with music on servers, that I felt was limited in scope, and insufficiant quality to show what I wanted to hear (dynamics, range, complexity, whatever).  It can be used as a convienient "reason" not to be able to play CDs or LPs people bring.  On the other hand, some had a good selection of good music and one even stoped to rip a Rachmaninoff CD to his hard drive that I wanted to hear. 
Also--
There were seminars going on all weekend, put on not by re-sellers, but manufactures, or I should say the actual engineers, as to problems, and what's being done about them.  Plenty of time for Q & A, and time to talk with them after.  It was good to see various engineers agreeing on the problems, and directions they were going in solving them--jitter, clocking, cables, filters, power, etc. 
And none of it was "buy my product," believe it or not. 
Yes, the problem exists, but people are working on it, at least at some level. 
Robert
11-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Vasyachkin
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts 47
Joined on 10-16-2008

Post #: 32
Post ID: 8828
Reply to: 6319
Missing piece of the puzzle
fiogf49gjkf0d
no good affordable music servers probably because people are usually EITHER into convenience ( mp3, solid state amps ) or into exotic high-end ( vinyl, valves )

very few people actually care about BOTH quality of sound and convenience

as far as manufacturers are concerned we don't exist

i think this is one of those times where you just have to DIY it.

also audiophilia is to a large degree fetishism. who wants to rip their CDs and DVDs to a hard drive and never get to play with CD booklets ?

i think the missing piece of the puzzle here is availability of lossless music for download. if you could download FLAC as easily as you can download MP3 then the servers would come.

as long as you need to rip your own CDs most people would rather play with the booklets.

just my opinion ...


visit my site:

http://www.diy-av.net
11-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Vasyachkin
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts 47
Joined on 10-16-2008

Post #: 33
Post ID: 8829
Reply to: 6623
Firewire
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Romy the Cat wrote:
 Telstar wrote:
I meant that the Lynx digital output may retain some noise from the computer, not that you get noise from the onboard soundcard (provided that you have one -You have onboard audio disabled in the bios, have you?)
OK, I will look in that firewire thing sometimes, I know little about it as now. Is quality of firewire controller important? Can I use my on-board firewire? Regarding the onboard audio disabled in bios – nope, I did not do it. The WaveLab that I use for recording and for has a configuration that allows selecting which audio devise is used. The Lynx care is listed then along with Windows default sound devise – I just do not use system default sound cards. I did deactivate on my other DAW the onboard audio and I’ve seen no difference in sound.


as far as firewire controllers Texas Instruments chipsets are considered less problematic. so not all are equal.

i am using Unibrain Fireboard Blue firewire adapter ( with Texas Instruments chipset ) with MOTU 828 Mk3 firewire soundcard.

it probably doesn't matter if the firewire card is onboard or add-on although onboard is typically preferred.

sometimes i get dropped audio for 2 or 3 seconds when a processor ( CPU not the DSP ) gets loaded up with some task such as installing software. other than that MOTU 828 MK3 seems to work well even under my Vsita X64 OS which is by far the most problematic OS.

build quality of MOTU 828 Mk3 is so-so. the device itself is very solid, heavy and rugged but the various knobs aren't soldered in place at exactly right angle which detracts from the sex appeal. overall engineering as well as drivers / software seem to be good though. MOTU is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts by the way.


visit my site:

http://www.diy-av.net
11-12-2008 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Vasyachkin
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts 47
Joined on 10-16-2008

Post #: 34
Post ID: 8830
Reply to: 8829
Forgot to say
fiogf49gjkf0d
i am using the digital output on the 828 Mk3 so can't comment on the sound except that i have no issues with it.

the card has one coax and two optical digital outputs and a whole bunch of analog balanced ones which i don't use.

i am using the coax ...


visit my site:

http://www.diy-av.net
08-02-2009 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 35
Post ID: 11267
Reply to: 6319
Where are the Chinese Music Servers?
fiogf49gjkf0d

I still do not know what audio people put in their hard drives but it looks like so called Music Servers become nowadays fashionable. The fashion is fashion but how not to take advantage of the people simplicity? The new NuForce Music Server  with price tag of $2,250 looks to me like a regular $300 PC that nowadays companies just trash or give to own employees for $15 buyout option.

http://www.nuforce.com/Product-MSR-CDP.htm

In fact they offer also free monitors….

I think the Chinese folks need to look toward to the market of US high-end Music Servers. It will be fun when the Chinese Music Servers hit US market.  All Music Servers are made by Chinese boards anyhow…  I anticipate that when it happens the “best imaginable” music sever will cost $599 and will do the very same as any snobby western machine.

The Cat


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
10-27-2009 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 36
Post ID: 12066
Reply to: 6319
How to manage the DAW remotely
fiogf49gjkf0d
In this thread there was a conversation about the way to manage the DAW remotely, from handheld devises, via sophisticated remote controls or running a remote desktop from a laptop. That all good but a few days back I was visited a local guy what demonstrated to me his ways and I LOVED it. It was ridiculously simple but VERY convenient. He has a projector that picks the signal from his DAW and tosses it on the wall between the loudspeakers. The guy is sitting in his chair with radio-mouse on the chair’s arms and juts is looking at the wall and clicking at the command icons – very elegant and very elegant. I love it and will try something similar…..

The caT


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
10-27-2009 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Vasyachkin
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts 47
Joined on 10-16-2008

Post #: 37
Post ID: 12067
Reply to: 12066
Touch screen remote
fiogf49gjkf0d
somebody should just write an app for iPhone to make it act as a remote control over Wi-Fi.browsing for music on the iPhone is quite convenient.  no reason why the same graphical touch interface couldn't be used as a remote control.
projectors use a fan ( noise ) to cool the lamp.  plus i tend to use iPhone's keyboard to search for music titles - can't do that with a mouse.
regards.


visit my site:

http://www.diy-av.net
Page 2 of 2 (37 items) Select Pages:  « 1 2
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Digital recorders: what the "big boys" use?..  Converters comparation....  Didital Things  Forum     15  131045  01-05-2005
  »  New  How to record FM broadcasts...  Left to center...  Off Air Audio Forum     125  1141978  11-04-2005
  »  New  The best practices for DAW Data Storage...  The Time Stamps Directories Synchronizer...  Didital Things  Forum     9  79432  09-24-2007
  »  New  Recording options: Pacific Microsonics vs. Lavry Gold...  Pacific Microsonics vs. Lavry Gold in D/A mode....  Didital Things  Forum     24  275332  09-27-2007
  »  New  Better DAW by a “second” echelon of digital efforts?..  Better DAW by a “second” echelon of digital efforts?...  Didital Things  Forum     0  17079  10-08-2007
  »  New  Reference Recordings “digital master” and Berkeley's ne..  The Berkeley Audio DAC’s processor....  Didital Things  Forum     13  194656  01-17-2008
  »  New  New sample 24/96 downloads from HDTT..  Or shall I say will you bat?...  Didital Things  Forum     20  156555  02-10-2008
  »  New  High Quality Music Server / CD player..  At What Point Does Corruption Occur?...  Didital Things  Forum     169  1132661  09-14-2008
  »  New  A lucidly implemented digital?..  A lucidly implemented digital?...  Didital Things  Forum     0  18546  11-18-2008
  »  New  To Rip or not to Rip...  Ripping with better playback...  Didital Things  Forum     2  34617  03-18-2009
  »  New  The contra-ridicules solution for a good DAW?..  Happy to see this thread...  Didital Things  Forum     1  33470  06-18-2009
  »  New  Weiss Engineering DAC202..  Attenuation...  Didital Things  Forum     5  54319  06-21-2010
  »  New  Why I hate computer playback...  Higher power cpu...  Didital Things  Forum     17  132272  04-16-2012
  »  New  Analog vs. Digital... without BS...  Are we comparing anything except our own prejudices?...  Didital Things  Forum     23  183357  04-15-2009
  »  New  Recording/Playback software..  Free stuff...  Didital Things  Forum     14  106008  08-24-2008
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts