| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Audio Discussions » It’s mad, mad, mad... electricity. (* posts, 25 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 67 of 96 (1,917 items) Select Pages:  « First ... « 65 66 67 68 69 » ... Last »
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  What lives in Symmetric Sound?..  The beginning of our journey is ALWAYS symmetrical...  Audio Discussions  Forum     19  175627  05-28-2004
  »  New  Always check power-line polarity...  The Cost of Knowing...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     11  112791  07-10-2005
  »  New  RAAL “Water Drop” tweeter for Macondo...  Your comment takes me by surprise...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     77  926469  02-16-2007
  »  New  My feelings about new exciting audio products..  Vacuumstate...  Audio Discussions  Forum     25  265262  04-30-2007
  »  New  Musique Concrete horns..  These are now sold as Kornhent products...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     6  108480  06-12-2007
  »  New  Compression drivers and the “clean signal”...  The NEW “Compression drivers and the clean signal”....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     14  163924  07-12-2007
  »  New  Digi Redux; Drive 1 transport and iDAT-44+ DAC..  Moray James SPDIF!...  Didital Things  Forum     27  231228  09-28-2007
  »  New  Metal domes..  Try the one Lansche is using...  Audio Discussions  Forum     6  79134  11-08-2007
  »  New  The power AC Outlets?..  Where to Pick Up the Gong?...  Audio Discussions  Forum     2  43275  10-31-2008
  »  New  The Avicenna's failure is the great Avicenna success!..  New life for Avicenna...  Audio Discussions  Forum     8  84166  02-03-2009
  »  New  Internet and electricity..  Suboptimal. . ....  Didital Things  Forum     1  29401  01-07-2010
  »  New  Electricity... power strips and ac improvements..  Electricity... power strips and ac improvements...  Audio Discussions  Forum     0  16717  03-30-2010
  »  New  Another example of energy..  Tehran 230v...  Audio Discussions  Forum     1916  9974001  01-29-2011
  »  New  I good spot-light for a turntable?..  Reply...  Analog Playback Forum     15  155144  10-24-2010
06-08-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
miab
Canada
Posts 46
Joined on 02-07-2008

Post #: 1321
Post ID: 20962
Reply to: 20961
Purepower and cable shielding
fiogf49gjkf0d
Adrian, can you confirm whether you were using cable with shielding or without? Like you I had the buzzing go away when on battery or without PP2000 in system. It became dead silent. Then with PP2000 back in system there was buzzing. I went to all shielded cabling with PP2000 in system and it went silent again. I attributed it to ground loops not EMI.
06-08-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,664
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 1322
Post ID: 20963
Reply to: 20962
Ground Potential
fiogf49gjkf0d
Perhaps the PP in the circuit raised the residual current on the neutral and/or ground line(s)? It doesn't take much resistance to get the front end humming. Of course, the Class D switching broadcasts all kinds of "noise", but this is much higher in frequency than "hum". Still, shielding might still help with "hum" if the shielding was grounded in a way that dropped ground resistance/residual current on the problematic line. This notion still supposes it's a "ground loop" problem; but it also "explains" the roles of the PP and the shielding in "causing" and "solving" a hum problem.


Paul S
06-08-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
drdna
San Francisco, California
Posts 526
Joined on 10-29-2005

Post #: 1323
Post ID: 20966
Reply to: 20962
Pure Power Internal Ground Fault
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Paul S wrote:
Perhaps the PP in the circuit raised the residual current on the neutral and/or ground line(s)? ...shielding might still help with "hum" if the shielding was grounded in a way that dropped ground resistance/residual current on the problematic line. This notion still supposes it's a "ground loop" problem; but it also "explains" the roles of the PP and the shielding in "causing" and "solving" a hum problem. 

Paul S
This is an interesting thought. It still comes back to there being a flaw in the construction of the PP units (but not the design, apparently since some units like Romy's did not have a problem).
 miab wrote:
Adrian, can you confirm whether you were using cable with shielding or without? Like you I had the buzzing go away when on battery or without PP2000 in system. It became dead silent. Then with PP2000 back in system there was buzzing. I went to all shielded cabling with PP2000 in system and it went silent again. I attributed it to ground loops not EMI.
Honestly, I cannot remember, because it has been a while since my PP2000 was "sent back for repairs." I make my own cables and wiring, and I avoid shielding unless it is needed for a specific purpose, then I add it. If I ever get the PP company to deliver on their many promises to ship me a replacement unit, I can certainly try this experiment.

Adrian
06-08-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1324
Post ID: 20967
Reply to: 20966
Plus or minus
fiogf49gjkf0d
I'm confused on whether these problems are only occurring in the later Plus version of the PP or in the original version as well. If it is only in the Plus then the problem must lie in whatever revisions/modifications were made. If in both then it is harder to know where the problem resides.

NB I only have the original version and do not have this issue.
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1325
Post ID: 20976
Reply to: 20961
What I am deducting....
fiogf49gjkf0d
 drdna wrote:
 Romy the Cat wrote:
First of all I need to admit that I do not believe to people who claim that Purepower produces noise. My units are completely silent and I know other people who have completely silent Purepowers. I have no doubts that the people who report noise do have nose but I attribute the nose to their lock of competence to deal with ground loops. There is another issue – no matter now inapt Purepower folks are and how negligent their assembly and testing I do not think that they can do anything that would make the unit to have the noise while it maintaining in and out grounds and while producing proper wave.
If you recall when I had in my possession my PP2000, before I sent it for repairs never to be returned, I did have some buzzing. Now my system is otherwise silent, and while group loops are always a concern, I do not think I was at fault. 

As you recall, the buzz vanished when the PP2000 was unplugged and run in battery mode. Since everything was plugged into the PP2000, nothing else about the circuit was changed. The only change was basically to remove the part of the circuit internal to the PP2000 which acts to process power from the wall outlet. So, I came to conclusion that there must be faulty ground loop wiring defect inside the PP2000.

The idea of faulty assembly was further suspected when the PP2000 failed outright. Of course, we will never know what actually was the issue, since when I sent it back for repairs, it disappeared and I never received a replacement.

Actually hat I am deducing from what you are saying is that the problem, whatever the problem is in the circuitry of buttery charging.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1326
Post ID: 20977
Reply to: 20962
Electro-magnetic fields
fiogf49gjkf0d
 miab wrote:
Adrian, can you confirm whether you were using cable with shielding or without? Like you I had the buzzing go away when on battery or without PP2000 in system. It became dead silent. Then with PP2000 back in system there was buzzing. I went to all shielded cabling with PP2000 in system and it went silent again. I attributed it to ground loops not EMI.
Miab, I do think that you contradict yourself. If you were able to address the problems you had with shielding then it is not ground loop as shielding has nothing to do with ground look but only help to deal with stray electro-magnetic fields. 


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,664
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 1327
Post ID: 20978
Reply to: 20977
Shields and Grounding
fiogf49gjkf0d
Since there is no hard and fast "rule" about patterns for grounding electrical circuitry with respect to a circuit or circuits, per se, it can and does happen that chasses or parts of chasses/circuits are not grounded along with the "main" circuit, itself, in various components or groups of components, or a "loop" might be created by one or another grounding configuration. In any case, I can imagine a situation where adding grounded shields better grounds a chassis/circuit, as opposed to "merely" performing the singular task of shielding the line from stray EMI. Not to say this did happen in Miab's case; but it might have.


Paul S
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1328
Post ID: 20979
Reply to: 20978
If, again if it is EMI...
fiogf49gjkf0d
... then I feel it needs to be addressed not shielded cables but by searching the source of it. if it is the case then I'm pretty sure that somewhere in battery charging circuitry there is some kind of pulse transformer or any other magnetic dispersing device that would be responsible for the problem. Those type of problems is much more important to address and source. I personally do not think that that would be the case as if the Canadian folks did forgot to put some kind of shield over battery charging circuitry or battery charging parts then they would react to the multiple complaints and would instantaneously knew what was wrong.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
clarkjohnsen
Boston, MA, US
Posts 298
Joined on 06-02-2004

Post #: 1329
Post ID: 20980
Reply to: 20978
Paul S is quite right
fiogf49gjkf0d
In addition I have to wonder if all the components are correctly aligned vis-a-vis their leakage-current orientations. The measurement is easily made, although sometimes the plugs will have to be reoriented 180°, which requires "cheaters" and an outboard ground connection. This process often achieves better sound as well!

clark
06-11-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1330
Post ID: 20981
Reply to: 20967
Which version is having which problem
fiogf49gjkf0d
Again I would ask people who are reporting problems to state whether they have the original PP or the Plus version made in the last few years. One issue that is definitely tied to the Plus version was the overheating that a NZ customer reported. It was confirmed by PP since they directed the customer to mod their own unit. It is unclear how many similar units are out there and whether any design change on the Plus is completely effective in resolving that overheating or whether it has just been made less overt. I assume Adrian had an original version with a hum problem which was incautiously returned to the PP black hole. Or was Adrian's unit a Plus?
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1331
Post ID: 20982
Reply to: 20981
PurePower versions
fiogf49gjkf0d
 steverino wrote:
Again I would ask people who are reporting problems to state whether they have the original PP or the Plus version made in the last few years. One issue that is definitely tied to the Plus version was the overheating that a NZ customer reported. It was confirmed by PP since they directed the customer to mod their own unit. It is unclear how many similar units are out there and whether any design change on the Plus is completely effective in resolving that overheating or whether it has just been made less overt.

It is not so simple. Unfortunately there is so such a thing as PurePower versions. Where is original PP then PP enhanced(double power) and then PP+ there is countless versions between. You see, PP is any other small company as I understand makes the units by batches. They order parts for let say 20 units (I do not know what the real number would be), make them, sell them and they reinvest the portion of net into a new batch. There is nothing wrong with it, most of the mall HiFi shops operate this way. The PurePower is slightly different as they are learn as they go, constantly fixing the thing and adjusting the unit for presumably better and more stable performance. I do testify that among probably 14 PP units that were in my hand and probably 10-12 units that I observe in the playback of the people that I know the progress is very tangible – the newer units are better than old one.

However the picture is not so ideal. While PurePower is improving their unit they perfectly capable to screw up something in this unit and it look like they have no quality control to catch it. It had happened before and I know that there was a period of PP production when they made faulty operating and sounding units.

So, in context of it I think it makes sense do not talk about version of PurePower but rather about the batch or vintage. The problem is that no one knows what constitute PurePower Bach, lately I do have a feeling that they make one-two units per order…
Saying all of it I need to admit the I have old and new PurePower unit that operate a flawlessly. Go gigure….


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
drdna
San Francisco, California
Posts 526
Joined on 10-29-2005

Post #: 1332
Post ID: 20983
Reply to: 20981
Pure Power Failures due to poor quality control
fiogf49gjkf0d
 steverino wrote:
Again I would ask people who are reporting problems to state whether they have the original PP or the Plus version made in the last few years. I assume Adrian had an original version with a hum problem which was incautiously returned to the PP black hole. Or was Adrian's unit a Plus?
Yes, my original unit was an original PP2000. The replacement unit would be a Plus series, but they never sent it back to me.
 Romy the Cat wrote:
Unfortunately there is so such a thing as PurePower versions.

While it is true that changes are constantly being made probably from unit to unit in production at APS, the major design change occurred with the adoption of Class D circuitry in the PP Plus series.
I suspect that the problems are caused by a mechanical/structural issue of the electrical circuit that is prone to failure in assembly or by damage in shipment. Maybe it would be best to just fly to their factory and pick one up in person.

Adrian
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1333
Post ID: 20984
Reply to: 20983
Wheels within wheels
fiogf49gjkf0d
Thanks Adrian and Romy for your replies. I can see a reason why PP is not servicing the original versions if there is such unit to unit variability. It would basically require discarding the original unit and sending out a PP plus in return in many cases. In my work some years ago I was tangentially involved in a somewhat similar circumstance with a large commercial electronic device. The difference was that changes were being made by customers (in cooperation with the vendor) to customize its operation. Thus the vendor did not know what it would find when it opened up a unit or at least each unit was sort of an individual case. Obviously maintenance was extremely costly. I remarked at the time that PP production was returned to Canada that I was very concerned about the establishment of a new manufacturing process coupled with untested design changes by a small company. I have never seen that work successfully.
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
drdna
San Francisco, California
Posts 526
Joined on 10-29-2005

Post #: 1334
Post ID: 20985
Reply to: 20984
Pure Power: will they ever honor their promise?
fiogf49gjkf0d
 steverino wrote:
It would basically require discarding the original unit and sending out a PP plus in return in many cases.
Wow, you really know how to twist the knife. I only WISH they would make good on their promise to send me a new unit... I even paid them an extra $$$$ on top of everything. They don't even respond to my e-mails any more.
 steverino wrote:
I remarked at the time that PP production was returned to Canada that I was very concerned about the establishment of a new manufacturing process coupled with untested design changes by a small company. I have never seen that work successfully.
It would be essential to at least track changes by designating a new version number, new part numbers, new schematics.

Adrian
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1335
Post ID: 20986
Reply to: 20985
Trying to shame PP
fiogf49gjkf0d
No Adrian my only goal has been repeated attempts here to shame PP into sending you your unit back repaired or replaced. Sadly I have been unsuccessful. If you think PP is cataloging each change they make I have a bridge I can sell you.
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1336
Post ID: 20987
Reply to: 20983
Silent like fish...
fiogf49gjkf0d
 drdna wrote:

While it is true that changes are constantly being made probably from unit to unit in production at APS, the major design change occurred with the adoption of Class D circuitry in the PP Plus series.
I suspect that the problems are caused by a mechanical/structural issue of the electrical circuit that is prone to failure in assembly or by damage in shipment. Maybe it would be best to just fly to their factory and pick one up in person.

 
Actually I do not believe in any damage in shipment. Not for the problem people report. Also, there was no “Class D circuitry in the PP Plus series”. The Class D circuitry was used from beginning of time in those regenerators. Sine you say that the unit worked fine for you from battery and developed problem only when It was running from the wall them most likely that if any problem did exist in there then it was in battery charging circuitry – in my view the weakest point in the whole unit. I do not think that it was “failure in assembly”. Most likely it was that in PP+ units they moved to 96V batteries and they redesigned the charging circuitry and that “redesign” had some faults. Still, I have my badly “redesigned” PP+ and they are silent like fish. So, following the simplest explanation I do blame the end users.
 


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1337
Post ID: 20988
Reply to: 20987
80/ 20 rule
fiogf49gjkf0d
I think any blanket statement that all the fault lies with PP or end users is going to be proved  wrong. My Bayesian estimate based on prior experience outside of audio is that 80% is some fault of manufacture  and 20% improper use or faulty troubleshooting by end users. In contrast with signal path components, end users are not likely modding or otherwise fiddling with an AC regenerator. The real issue is that there is no reliable repair center where statistics could be gathered on the various problems and their resolution. Romy at least can send his units back if a problem develops and PP will actually try to fix it or send him another. If my unit develops a problem that I can't resolve, it goes in the trash.
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1338
Post ID: 20989
Reply to: 20988
What else is available?
fiogf49gjkf0d
 steverino wrote:
The real issue is that there is no reliable repair center where statistics could be gathered on the various problems and their resolution. Romy at least can send his units back if a problem develops and PP will actually try to fix it or send him another. If my unit develops a problem that I can't resolve, it goes in the trash.

Well, the reality is a bit less straightforward then you think. I do not think that the units that I have are some kind of special PurePower regenerators that made to performer and the rest units are faulty. I absolutely confident that I have very much regular stock units, I did get faulty units as well and there was a time what I was sitting months with the PP unit and they keep promise me that it will be shipped “tomorrow”.

To the best of my knowledge the only customatization that even done to my units there was one signal level cable made shielded and the EMI spice insider of the unit offset the switching circuitry. I discovered it after 2 weeks experimenting with PP, so PP folks fixed it and I think they do it on each unit since then.

I do not think that I can easily fix PP it or get replacement. PurePower is not the company with many ready to be sipped unit laying around and I am not the person who would let the properly sounding PP to live my house – who know what would be replacements. So, I am very much pray that PP do not blow and if it does then I will be in the very same Q with anyone else.

There is however, something about me that distinct me from at least the folks who post at this site. I do very much believe in PP sound. The PP company, this marketing and service practice – this is all a completely separate subject and they shall be shamed. However, the sound of the properly operating PP to me set all bets off. I can bitch about PP and express what I like and do not like but instead I chose to be supporter of PP because I very much respect and appreciate the result the PP units can deliver. I have zero loyalty to the company and PP people know it but I do have understanding that today PP is a monopoly and besides PP not one makes class D generators that approved sound. I spend year dealing with PP and I know what Sound they produces. For sure it might be 54,000 other class D generators that sound even better – will you waste months/years and much money of your life for testing them? If someone would I would be happy to know that I do not need to play that PP are operational but until I have an alternative I just have no other options. One need to spend years of playing with power devises, discover the PP sound and then to learn appreciate what he has instend of fantasize about what is not available.
 


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
06-14-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
steverino
Posts 367
Joined on 05-23-2009

Post #: 1339
Post ID: 20990
Reply to: 20989
Reading something not written
fiogf49gjkf0d
At no time have I ever stated that you got a gold plated unit. I trust your statements 100% unlike many others. My only point is that PP for marketing reasons would at least make a real attempt to fix a unit you sent back. If I had a problem not resolvable locally, I would just throw out the PP because it would never get fixed and I would be out the shipping cost. The only alternative is to buy a used unit if one becomes available. I understand your point about the lack of ready alternatives at this moment although I am hopeful that someone else will come along soon since the basic double conversion process is widely available. If it weren't for the fans unneeded for home use in the available units, I could have tried 3 or 4 units for a total under $2k.
07-20-2014 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
drdna
San Francisco, California
Posts 526
Joined on 10-29-2005

Post #: 1340
Post ID: 21108
Reply to: 20990
Pure Power 3000+ has arrived!
fiogf49gjkf0d
Now fully five years after the original PP2000 was in my system, then subsequently stopped working and was sent back for repairs to the manufacturer. An unfortunate series of events involving the Chinese subcontractor resulted in the company contracting severely, and my original unit was lost. Numerous excuses were made, but eventually the APS company made it back on their feet.

Almost beyond belief after such a long time, and thanks to those here who encouraged APS to "do the right thing" and send me a replacement unit; finally it has arrived! I waited to report on this until the unit was actually physically in my possession... 

But now it is here. APS sent me a PP3000 Plus unit including the Power Pack and Furutech FPX-R receptacles. After plugging it in and letting it settle for a few days, I have been listening to it this weekend. The sound is as I remember it. It is frankly impossible to make a direct comparison to the PP2000 as it has been such a long time, but all my original remarks apply. The only thing missing is the buzzing hum which plagued my first unit. This unit is absolutely silent in operation, leading perhaps credence to my original suspicion that the original buzzing was due to a manufacturing defect. 

Now it is totally silent and the Sound is coming through gloriously again. More commentary to come in a while...

Worth the wait.

Adrian
Page 67 of 96 (1,917 items) Select Pages:  « First ... « 65 66 67 68 69 » ... Last »
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  What lives in Symmetric Sound?..  The beginning of our journey is ALWAYS symmetrical...  Audio Discussions  Forum     19  175627  05-28-2004
  »  New  Always check power-line polarity...  The Cost of Knowing...  Audio For Dummies ™  Forum     11  112791  07-10-2005
  »  New  RAAL “Water Drop” tweeter for Macondo...  Your comment takes me by surprise...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     77  926469  02-16-2007
  »  New  My feelings about new exciting audio products..  Vacuumstate...  Audio Discussions  Forum     25  265262  04-30-2007
  »  New  Musique Concrete horns..  These are now sold as Kornhent products...  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     6  108480  06-12-2007
  »  New  Compression drivers and the “clean signal”...  The NEW “Compression drivers and the clean signal”....  Horn-Loaded Speakers Forum     14  163924  07-12-2007
  »  New  Digi Redux; Drive 1 transport and iDAT-44+ DAC..  Moray James SPDIF!...  Didital Things  Forum     27  231228  09-28-2007
  »  New  Metal domes..  Try the one Lansche is using...  Audio Discussions  Forum     6  79134  11-08-2007
  »  New  The power AC Outlets?..  Where to Pick Up the Gong?...  Audio Discussions  Forum     2  43275  10-31-2008
  »  New  The Avicenna's failure is the great Avicenna success!..  New life for Avicenna...  Audio Discussions  Forum     8  84166  02-03-2009
  »  New  Internet and electricity..  Suboptimal. . ....  Didital Things  Forum     1  29401  01-07-2010
  »  New  Electricity... power strips and ac improvements..  Electricity... power strips and ac improvements...  Audio Discussions  Forum     0  16717  03-30-2010
  »  New  Another example of energy..  Tehran 230v...  Audio Discussions  Forum     1916  9974001  01-29-2011
  »  New  I good spot-light for a turntable?..  Reply...  Analog Playback Forum     15  155144  10-24-2010
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts