| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Analog Playback» The last phonocorrector: “End of Life" Phonostage (284 posts, 14 pages)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 15 of 15 (284 items) Select Pages:  « First ... « 11 12 13 14 15
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Where are our good phonostages?..  Omnigon Tubes...  Analog Playback Forum     61  412739  05-31-2004
  »  New  The Expressive Technologies SU-1..  “too bright” or “resolution” or “details” with SUT prim...  Analog Playback Forum     33  241452  12-30-2004
  »  New  EAR 834P Modification Guide..  Copper air caps...  Analog Playback Forum     38  392540  02-09-2006
  »  New  My Analog Playback: the fat lady has sung..  My analog setup update....  Analog Playback Forum     9  78714  04-04-2006
  »  New  Phono stages with SU-1..  SU-1...  Analog Playback Forum     4  42650  11-23-2007
  »  New  Chasing utopian better phono interconnect...  Did I miss something?...  Analog Playback Forum     6  73794  06-05-2008
  »  New  Buying a last cartridge...  Lucky you...  Analog Playback Forum     80  515329  09-05-2008
  »  New  EAR 834P mods..  Copper air caps...  Analog Playback Forum     38  392540  11-04-2008
  »  New  AMR PH-77: just another phonostage or more?..  Oh, yeah... the sound of the Thing Itself......  Analog Playback Forum     11  81195  07-05-2009
  »  New  An interesting Russian pnonocorrector...  Uber-tweeky phono topologies deconstructed...  Analog Playback Forum     9  52275  03-01-2010
  »  New  Expressive Technologies SU-1 and cartridge output and i..  MV and Ohms...  Analog Playback Forum     2  18621  07-07-2011
  »  New  How to run MM-type cartridge into MC phonostage?..  Quite interesting....  Analog Playback Forum     6  35083  11-13-2011
  »  New  The tales of two phonostages: Allnic and 834PT...  The tales of two phonostages: Allnic and 834PT....  Analog Playback Forum     0  13512  12-21-2011
06-17-2015 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,486
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 281
Post ID: 21716
Reply to: 21715
The Thorsten’s mark.
fiogf49gjkf0d

Yes, Thorsten was the man that made the initial modification in the EAR 834 and I need to note that it was not redesign of any kind but juts basic modifications and admitting the unnecessary things. Even though Thorsten is the industry person he did not play any game sand posted his write up open and public. My contribution to the projects was supplementing the EAR 834PT (“T” comes from Thorsten) with no dielectric capacitors (air caps) and bounding it with ET-2 transformer that make great phonostage to be “End of the Life” phonostage. I do not particularly care about my priority in this process as I do audio for MYSELF. All of those industry idiots do not get that for a person who does audio excessively for own needs all their stupid self-pomposity is very much irrelevant and their pretentiousness screaming is just a noise to me.

Still, do not discard behind the stupid TdP behavior the elegance of 834 TdP’s design and the quality of 834’s sound. > >




"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
01-30-2017 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 441
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 282
Post ID: 22933
Reply to: 16916
Sound beats engeneering
 Romy the Cat wrote:
fiogf49gjkf0d1)   

3)      The common mode filter you have at the PS’s input- why do you use them? They do eat some dynamics. As many time I removed them from all imaginary components as many time I witnessed better sound.



After a long break I'm slowly comming back to my system. Only now I've found the time to check that and I must agree with Romy: Removing CM filters, MOVs, arresters the rest of the engeneering crap (apart from the hour meter) from the power lines has cleaned the sound, its more emotionally involving, direct, the dynamical contrast does seem better. The change was rather subtle but noticeabe, in a bit similar direction as my experiments with vibration decoupling- some subtle veil got removed.

Cheers,
Jarek



Cheers,
Jarek
01-30-2017 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,104
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 283
Post ID: 22935
Reply to: 22933
Engineering Crap
Yes, an ongoing theme here at GSC: If it sounds good, it is good.  Conversely, no matter the "logic", and no matter the "technical genius" or "technological breakthroughs", if it sounds bad, it is bad. Likewise with any sort of "logic" or "intuition" that is not actually borne out by acceptable sound: it is not good.  The problem with the empirical/subjective method for audio is mainly time/money, also the Big Problem that the listener's tastes are required to make the judgement calls in the first place. Of course, this is antithetical to most engineer's ideas about who they are and what they and their ilk stand for; hence the discussions on their forums vs. here at GSC.

Best regards,
Paul S
01-30-2017 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
N-set
Gdansk, Poland
Posts 441
Joined on 01-07-2006

Post #: 284
Post ID: 22936
Reply to: 22935
Its not that it sounds "better"
it's more similar to removing say some delicate wool from your ears. I guess some recordings benefited from a bit of the veil but then its a problem of the recording.

 Paul S wrote:
also the Big Problem that the listener's tastes are required to make the judgement calls in the first place.


In this case I hear an increased recognition of low level details (e.g. when musicians take air in your hear it as taking air in), which
I'd promote to sth more objective than just down to the taste. Anyway, vinyls kept spinning.

Cheers,
Jarek



Cheers,
Jarek
Page 15 of 15 (284 items) Select Pages:  « First ... « 11 12 13 14 15
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Where are our good phonostages?..  Omnigon Tubes...  Analog Playback Forum     61  412739  05-31-2004
  »  New  The Expressive Technologies SU-1..  “too bright” or “resolution” or “details” with SUT prim...  Analog Playback Forum     33  241452  12-30-2004
  »  New  EAR 834P Modification Guide..  Copper air caps...  Analog Playback Forum     38  392540  02-09-2006
  »  New  My Analog Playback: the fat lady has sung..  My analog setup update....  Analog Playback Forum     9  78714  04-04-2006
  »  New  Phono stages with SU-1..  SU-1...  Analog Playback Forum     4  42650  11-23-2007
  »  New  Chasing utopian better phono interconnect...  Did I miss something?...  Analog Playback Forum     6  73794  06-05-2008
  »  New  Buying a last cartridge...  Lucky you...  Analog Playback Forum     80  515329  09-05-2008
  »  New  EAR 834P mods..  Copper air caps...  Analog Playback Forum     38  392540  11-04-2008
  »  New  AMR PH-77: just another phonostage or more?..  Oh, yeah... the sound of the Thing Itself......  Analog Playback Forum     11  81195  07-05-2009
  »  New  An interesting Russian pnonocorrector...  Uber-tweeky phono topologies deconstructed...  Analog Playback Forum     9  52275  03-01-2010
  »  New  Expressive Technologies SU-1 and cartridge output and i..  MV and Ohms...  Analog Playback Forum     2  18621  07-07-2011
  »  New  How to run MM-type cartridge into MC phonostage?..  Quite interesting....  Analog Playback Forum     6  35083  11-13-2011
  »  New  The tales of two phonostages: Allnic and 834PT...  The tales of two phonostages: Allnic and 834PT....  Analog Playback Forum     0  13512  12-21-2011
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts