|
xandcg
Rio de Janeiro, BR.
Posts 218
Joined on 09-07-2014
Post #:
|
3
|
Post ID:
|
22374
|
Reply to:
|
22368
|
|
|
|
fiogf49gjkf0d I believe he found out his academic/musical background serve well as marketing for the most of his potential clients. But funny he was the first to say, in others words, it means nothing for audio purposes:
"... It’s not that they necessarily listen to different things, it’s just
that when you know a piece of music very well, either by having played
it or having studied the score, or having heard it many times in
concert, you don’t necessarily need a reproduction system that helps you
hear all the details, because you compensate mentally for what isn’t so
clear in the reproduction. If, for example, you can’t clearly hear all
the notes in dense or complex textures, you can mentally separate out
what’s going on if you know the piece well; then it’s not so bad if it
sounds like a bit of a mess to an audiophile ear, in that sense. So it’s
true that as a professional musician, it doesn’t necessarily matter how
much you can hear through the recording when you already know what’s
there. ..."
Think for yourself, do not be sheep.
|
|
|