|
|
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,688
Joined on 10-12-2006
|
Post #:
|
2
|
|
Post ID:
|
27868
|
|
Reply to:
|
27866
|
|
|
|
|
Lots of food for thought here. I do recognize some resistance on my own part, and I think it's (at least partially) because I actually like the process of making the system to sound like I want it to sound, not to mention I am currently "invested" in my personal results. Also, there is some skepticism about rendering Big Great Works by such ostensibly "limited means". Even though any playback is limited, how can it not be a matter of degree? How great to swap a few parts and swap limitations for a pint-sized psychic hardwire! Pocket MP3 player and cordless earbuds doing a better job for me with Bruckner than my current set-up! I guess we're talking a "new and improved topology" with greater Musical Potency, that swamps what might currently be viewed as limitations... right? Part of me is on the edge of my seat, and part is thinking, "Bob Carver on acid..."
Paul S
|
|
|