I do not know what they do and the story is a bit murky but still it would be interesting to learn what they are dealing with as it might be very much related to the problem I am familiar with.

http://www.synergisticresearch.com/featured/new-tranquility-base/

if the concept and the solution that the Synergistic Research uses works then it not suppose to be a “platform” for an indivisible devise but rather a global solution for while installation.

John Hoffman published an article in positive-feedback about the Liquid filled fuse:

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue61/audiomagic_nano.htm

… from audio-magic company.

http://www.audio-magic.com/Prod-NanoFuse.html

The whole story a bit controversial of cause but since my old POD cable I’m kind of a bit sucker for using liquid with electric conductors…

I did look at the audio-magic site. The make some power conditioning devises but I am a bit confused by their overly-liberated use of the word liquid. I was expected to see some kind of new power treating devise submerged in liquid but instead they use “Liquid Air” whatever it means. Would it be the same as manufacture who use “nickel-core transformers” made from iron? Anyhow, I juts would like to pay attention to the company.

There is one more thing that I would like to pay attention.  The company and the users claim improvement while using the fuse after 60 hours of break-in. That is good but I have a question to ask: how methodologically, theoretically or even hypothetically they were able to lock the normal change in greed electricity that took place over 60 hours if they do not use any means of power quality stabilization?

Synergistic Research looks like has a product that deal with electricity:

http://www.synergisticresearch.com/category/tesla-power-products/

http://www.synergisticresearch.com/tesla-power-products/the-powercell-story/

http://www.synergisticresearch.com/featured/galileo-series/

To grant to the product Tesla name is a bit… stupid but I guess this is how the industry feel.

I read the description of the theory and the way how they plug the Big Bang and the String Theory into the game. Sounds incredibly brainless, the explanation sounds brainless, not the way how the Powercell units sound themselves. I have no idea how the Powercell units sound and the reason I post it is to ask if anyone dealt with them.

Whatever subatomic, String of voodoo concept they use it for sure does not deal with fix the waveform clipping, this is what PP does but I wonder if it might be beneficial to try these  Powercell AFTER PurePower and to see if Synergistic Research “quantum intelligence” will be able to handle, or perhaps even to capitalize, the sound that PP does. My former experience with people who claim any dealing with quantum was very non-satisfactory but I did not deal with Synergistic Research’s power devises.

ricksmet wrote:

PurePower, www.purepoweraps.com, just updated their site and have some interesting videos on the new PurePower+ products.

Romy the Cat wrote:

I would be particularly interested to hear a feedback from the people who use PP3000 and who upgraded it to PP+…

manisandher wrote:

So why do I now prefer the sound with the PP2000 as opposed to last year when I stopped using it? I think it's because last year I never plugged all the components into it. Playing around with various configurations these last couple of day, what I've learned is that everything has to be plugged into the PP... even the PC. Otherwise the sound is too bright, forward and edgy, my main criticisms. Last year this was easily fixed by running from battery, but now with all the components running off the PP, the PP sounds very similar running from AC or from battery. I've just ordered a PP+3000 for my main system - the PP2000 will feed my study/office system. I'll report my thoughts on the difference between the two when the new one arrives in a few weeks' time.

Romy the Cat wrote:

You claim that it was “everything plugged” syndrome but I was writing about it years back and I thought that it was what you were doing. Even if you did not then in my view the superbly positive contribution of PP was still very observable…

Romy the Cat wrote:

Were you able to upgrade your PP2000 to PP3000+ or you just got another unit? If you have both of them then it would be very interesting to hear your comments about Sound of PP vs. PP+.

manisandher wrote:

Well I can pretty much replicate the sound I was getting last year - simply have the DAC and power amps plugged into the PP and the PC plugged into the wall socket.  The sound becomes brighter, thinner and more edgy. This is eliminated immediately by switching to battery and taking the power cord out of the PP. This effect is consistent and repeatable - I tried many, many times to be sure. I suspect that some sort of ground loop is introduced via the USB cable linking the PC to the DAC when the PC is connected to the wall socket, but who knows.

Romy the Cat wrote:

From what you describe I conclude that you have ground loops regardless of the PPs and the PP juts highlights the problem.

Ironic name of the review but it is what it is. Frank Alles posted a review about PS Audio P3 unit. It is not very informative but generally more or less sensible.

http://www.stereotimes.com/acc072312.shtml

I did not hear the new generation of PS Audio regenerator and I can’t relate to Frank findings.