| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Playback Listening » A response to David Hurvitz (7 posts, 1 page)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) Select Pages: 
12-15-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,182
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1
Post ID: 27753
Reply to: 27753
A response to David Hurvitz



"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-16-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,671
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 2
Post ID: 27754
Reply to: 27753
What He Said!
Yes, David Hurwitz is a wonderful, thoughtful and sane music-loving musicologist and critic who does not seem to take himself too seriously (although he knows what he knows). No surprise he is not an audio guy (any more than most musicians), and no surprise to me that he perceives a disconnect between audiophilia and Music, since Music has so little to do with "mainstream audio" in the first place, including the people who have achieved the pinnacle of mainstream audio by acquiring and assembling the most talked about electronics as an end in itself, or possibly as a means of hearing a test recording a certain proscribed way. Of course this is anathema to David and his ilk, and again no surprise that he is not aware of high-end audio as we approach it. And since our numbers are few, he likely has no idea how little use we have for mainstream audio, probably for similar or maybe the same reasons he is repulsed by it.

Great post. Nice to have it articulated and archived.

Get well!

Best regards,
Paul S
12-16-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,182
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 3
Post ID: 27755
Reply to: 27754
The "problem" with David Hurwitz
David Hurwitz is wonderful, but I have said in my video that I have some very fundamental disagreements with him. It is not his selection, recommendations or reasoning, this would be a normal agreement of disagreement that would be perfectly fine between different people and there is nothing fundamental in it.   The fundamental disagreements between his and my approach are in 2 following aspects:
 
1)      David uses his judgment to navigate and guide his followers to buy the specific recording as “best buy”.  This, my view compromises his recordation for the best representation of a specific interpretation or the interpretation concept. It feels like he does not want to appear as a “recordings pimp” but I very much like him to act as the recording’s solicitor.
 
2)      In my view David too much gravitates to the “concert style of opera”. What I mean is that he in my view accurately identifies purely the musical value of specific recordings but the experience we, the listeners, have with the recording does not necessarily have a direct correlation with purely musical value, and here is where the “concert style of opera”. The experience of opera is a complex multifaceted theatrical experience, Yes, music and singing are a huge part of it but there are many other factors: specific stage production, the charisma of the actors, and many others. In the end it the problem with David, in my view, is that he undermines the process of listening to a recording as a sacred transcendent event and converts it to a transactional hierarchical auditioning, a sort of “concert style of opera”.  One of the greater benefits of perceiving musicality from a true High-End Audio perspective is that the process of listening is meant to be a holy divine ceremony, and the owner of the playback does not want to compromise it with either by weak interpretation of the work nor by barbaric recording technics and certainly not by ferocious efforts of playback chain to compromise the expressivity of a musical interpretation.
 
If David took the above under consideration, he would be much more impactful in his recommendations, including selling more CDs and I am only welcome to it.


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-16-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Paul S
San Diego, California, USA
Posts 2,671
Joined on 10-12-2006

Post #: 4
Post ID: 27756
Reply to: 27755
Transactional vs. Devotional
Hmmm...

I have not heard David speak about opera, but I am very used to musicologists deconstructing a performance, and/or "leaving out" certain "human aspects" of a given performance or part of a performance, and I can certainly see where this might reach the acute stage where opera is concerned. I do not notice that he is trying to sell me something, perhaps I just don't listen for that, rather it seems to me he is "finding a need and filling it" with "soft sell" recommendations, as people generally seem to want information and recommendations about everything. I completely agree about the Divinity of Music but not surprised when people do not get it or they do not aim and work to that end. Just don't speak ill of Maria Callas...

Paul S
12-17-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
mats
Chicago
Posts 87
Joined on 09-18-2005

Post #: 5
Post ID: 27759
Reply to: 27755
A sacred transcendent event
Peter Szendy is a serious and sympathetic thinker. 
Judging from this conversation with Mladen Dolar 

https://youtu.be/IcjwgXQ7QwM?si=yzr5rigLEjT9DT0v

his book Listen: A History of our Ears, promises to be a good read. 
From the jacket blurb:
“…where exactly does the listener stand in relation to the music s/he listens to? 
What is the responsibility of the listener? 
Does a listener have any rights, as the author and composer have copyright? Szendy explains his love of musical arrangement (since arrangements allow him to listen to someone listening to music), 
and wonders whether it is possible in other ways to convey to others how we ourselves listen to music. 
How can we share our actual hearing with others?”

On a perhaps related note, I find the Giuliani B9 LP from the Original Source series 
more beautiful than my CD versions. Possible less compression, richer foundation, and lovely tone. 


/ mats
12-17-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 10,182
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 6
Post ID: 27760
Reply to: 27759
This is very good news!
 mats wrote:
On a perhaps related note, I find the Giuliani B9 LP from the Original Source series 
more beautiful than my CD versions. Possible less compression, richer foundation, and lovely tone. 
This is VERY good news! Can you send a link?


"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
12-17-2024 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
mats
Chicago
Posts 87
Joined on 09-18-2005

Post #: 7
Post ID: 27764
Reply to: 27760
DG link
https://store.deutschegrammophon.com/products/carlo-maria-giulini-wiener-philharmoniker-bruckner-sinfonien-nr-7-9

Not actually in the Original Source series as I suggested. 
It is a current pressing, and sounds very good to my ears. 
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) Select Pages: 
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts