GoodSoundClub - Romy the Cat's Audio Site - In my view it’s cartridge dependant.

02-12-2012

Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree

RonyWeissman
Lyon, France
Posts 138
Joined on 05-29-2004

Post #:	1
Post ID:	17819
Reply to:	17819

3012 silicon dumping

Hi Romy,
When youmdiscuss silicon dumping with your 3012 do you mean the silicon you put on headshell orDo you mean you use a silicon bath to damp the arm resonance, or both? I can't find the thread and I have decided to spend some time with my vinyl setup this year, see if i can become one with my micro seiki.
Thanks, Rony

02-12-2012

Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree

Romy the Cat

Boston, MA
Posts 10,183
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #:	2
Post ID:	17821
Reply to:	17819

In my view it’s cartridge dependant.

RonyWeissman wrote:
When youmdiscuss silicon dumping with your 3012 do you mean the silicon you put on headshell orDo you mean you use a silicon bath to damp the arm resonance, or both? I can't find the thread and I have decided to spend some time with my vinyl setup this year, see if i can become one with my micro seiki.

Putting the silicon in headshell was not “dumping” but rather increased the headshell mass. I did used the silicon bath with 3012 but it was not to deal with resonance. I had my 9Hz with the silicon bath or without it. The silicon bath does very slightly, to my ears, impact the character of transients. Not even the transients but the character of transients. At the time I used Shelter 901 that is very brutal cartridge I felt that silicon bath was beneficial. As I moved to my current Jubilee I felt that there is no need for silicon bath anymore, at least I did not hear any sonic advantages.

The Cat

"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche