|
Romy the Cat
Boston, MA
Posts 10,166
Joined on 05-28-2004
Post #:
|
24
|
Post ID:
|
24756
|
Reply to:
|
24753
|
|
|
|
Daniel wrote: | This is a bit of a childish "I'm right! - No, I'm
right! - No, I'm right!" 'discussion'. I know that there are differences
between acouctic live, amplified live and playback of a recording and never
stated there wasn't or one could ever be mistaken for the other.
But I don't think we need to argue that certain systems fail
to transport certain aspects of musical presentation. And some others fail a little
less.
|
|
Daniel, I do not think that
this is childish 'discussion' and I assure you that I am very far from a desire
to convince you in anything. Generally, at this site people do not try to
convince others and deeply individualistic approach is more suitable in here. I
reacted to what I felt was appropriate and if you feel that it was not appropriate
then it is fine. For one person “something” might be a deep philosophical postulation
and for another person the very same “something” might be just a blabbering in
open air. The fact that certain systems
fail or success to transport certain aspects of musical presentation has very little
relation to what I was saying. I do feel that you did not “get” what I was advocated and it is fine…
martinshorn wrote: | Daniel, seeing your words describing needs for
live sound, i seriously recommend to copy Klaus Speth' System in a first
instance. |
|
Here we go. Let me to bring
a counterpoint to this. The best experience from Rachmaninoff Second Concerto, including
multiple very fine live performance, I had approximately 10 years ago when I
rented U-Hall truck and played Janies CD at the truck’ s stock system. So, following
the Martinshorn’s recommendation if you, Daniel, want to get the best in sound reproduction
then rent U-Hall truck. :-)
"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
|
|
|