| Search | Login/Register
   Home » Musical Discussions » The Eduardo Chibas and Bruckner (1 post, 1 page)
  Print Thread | 1st Post |  
Page 1 of 1 (1 items) Select Pages: 
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Bruckner, me and the Seventh..  From Memory...  Musical Discussions  Forum     81  461869  07-17-2007
07-03-2007 Post does not mapped to Knowledge Tree
Romy the Cat


Boston, MA
Posts 9,547
Joined on 05-28-2004

Post #: 1
Post ID: 4699
Reply to: 4699
The Eduardo Chibas and Bruckner

I have to admit that I am not a huge fun of the Chibas’ Bruckner. Well, he might be OK but am very much do NOT like how the Orquesta Sinfónica Venezuela sounds. All the exuberant reviews about the recordings are juts a pile of reviewing crap. There are some conductors whose interviews I prefer to listen instead of listening their orchestras. Daniel Barenboim for instance is a brilliant mind and very interesting speaker but I hardly can stand when he conducts (with a few exceptions when he was younger). The same way, I do not like what Chibas’ did with his orchestra and Bruckner but I do like to read his thoughts about conducting. The following context is courtesy to John F. Berky, the owner of:

http://www.abruckner.com

Eduardo Chibás was born in Havana, Cuba. He later moved to New York, where he graduated from Columbia University with a Masters Degree in Applied Mathematics and Operations Research. In 1971 he moved to Caracas to work in marketing at Procter & Gamble and later in Macosarto. He then founded AW Publicidad, today AW Nazca Saatchi & Saatchi, one of the leading advertising agencies in the country, and of which Chibás is currently its President.

Eduardo Chibás is indeed proud of being a music lover, a self-taught conductor who does it for love of the music. In 1992 he conducted an orchestra for the first time, thanks to the support of the Orquesta Sinfónica Venezuela and its then music director, Eduardo Marturet. On that occasion, he conducted Wagner’s Meistersinger Prelude.

Since 1996 he has conducted on various occasions the Octeto Académico de Caracas in arrangements for wind octet of Beethoven’s Seventh and Eighth Symphonies as well as excerpts from Mozart’s Don Giovanni.

In 1996, he again conducted the Orquesta Sinfónica Venezuela in Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony and works by Wagner. Maestro Sándor Végh, who was music director of the Camerata Academica Salzburg, and who twice came to Caracas, praised this interpretation of Beethoven’s Seventh, a recording of which he was able to hear in Salzburg shortly before his death.

In October of 1997, Eduardo Chibás conducted Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony. As a result of this concert, he was invited to Portugal, where in February of 1999 he conducted Beethoven’s Eroica with the Orchestra of the North of Portugal. On his return from Europe, he began a cycle of the Beethoven symphonies with the Orquesta Sinfónica de Carabobo. This cycle was issued on CD in Venezuela, the first complete set of Beethoven symphonies produced in the country.

In May 2001, he conducted the Camerata Salzburg in the Teatro Municipal de Caracas, in a program that included Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony and Violin Concerto, this last piece with Alexander Janiczek as soloist.

In recent years he has continued to conduct the Orquesta Sinfónica Venezuela and the Orquesta Sinfónica de Carabobo. In May of 2004 he conducted Bruckner’s 7th Symphony, the first time this work had ever been performed by the Orquesta Sinfónica Venezuela.  In 2005, he conducted the premiere in Venezuela of Bruckner’s 8th Symphony. Both of these live recordings have been released on CD and are listed in this discography.

Eduardo Chibás – On Conducting

I first heard Bruckner in a musical appreciation class in high school.  It was a short selection from the Ninth Symphony, and I went out immediately to buy it. I was in love with Bruckner from then on. Although Beethoven is the center of my musical life, Wagner and Bruckner are also of immense importance. In fact, there have been periods in my life when I have listened almost exclusively to Bruckner.

I am not at all a religious man, so that the mystical/religious aspect of his music does not interest me much. I know that this is what moves many people towards Bruckner. However, I am interested in life and the human struggle, the raw material of heroic art. It is dangerous to assume that Wagner and Bruckner were heirs of Beethoven, since individuality is such an important aspect of the heroic ethic that heroes and heroic artists rarely, if ever, have any heirs. On the other hand, heroic artists all share certain values and attitudes which sometimes lead to astounding coincidences. As an example of this, I have put together a presentation showing the coincidences in form and content between Michelangelo’s Sistine ceiling and Beethoven’s Eroica Symphony. Thus, it can be useful to use what one learns from one of these artists to understand the others better.

In the music of Bruckner, it is the sublime experience, together with its elemental erotic and demonic content, that mostly fascinates me. The catharsis accompanying a sublime experience can liberate one from the debilitating limitations of everyday life. This is perhaps the fundamental objective of heroic art: liberation. Some may say that this is similar to the religious experience. The difference between the heroic and religious experience is that the first is, in Wagner’s expression, “purely human”. In terms of musical interpretation, the religious perspective will emphasize the mystery and immensity, while the heroic perspective will emphasize the human struggle and, as stated before, its erotic and demonic elements. The attitude towards the demonic elements is particularly important. A “Catholic” attitude would look to either minimizing or exorcising them. A “heroic” attitude would look to incorporating them in the creative process of life. The difference stems from their objectives: the first involves trying to be good rather than evil, while the second involves trying to be the best you can be. In this regard, Bruckner’s music seems to me to fall more into the second of these. But maybe this is simply bias on my part.

After this explanation, it shouldn’t be surprising that my favorite conductor is Furtwängler. Fortunately I discovered him very early in my musical formation. When I was at Columbia, I even did a radio program on WKCR devoted exclusively to Furtwängler recordings. I also find Jochum, Asahina and Barenboim particularly illuminating. I have been lucky enough to hear Barenboim live on many occasions. I have also been able to see him rehearse. This has been a tremendous help to me.

About my conducting, let me tell you that I think that the technical aspects are greatly exaggerated. Certainly, there has to be some talent for it, as well as the hubris required to tell a hundred professional musicians how to play something. Certainly, you have to decide how you are going to beat every measure, but this is not really very difficult. Intonation is difficult, and I have to rely on my memory for that, but one could argue that professional musicians should be responsible for playing the right notes. Tempo changes are also difficult. However, empirical experimentation in rehearsals, and even in concerts, should allow a conductor to figure out how to accomplish this well enough, if never perfectly: a truly improvised change of tempo, based on the necessity of the moment, will never come off perfectly (Furtwängler live recordings are a good demonstration of this, even with the Berlin and Vienna Philharmonics).

Having tackled these problems, which I insist are not very difficult, the real issue is what the music is about, or what ideas it should communicate. This is only important with music that contains ideas, but certainly it applies to Beethoven, Wagner and Bruckner. Next, you have to decide how it should sound so as to communicate these ideas. These are very difficult issues in that they require a great deal of thinking. Having listened to recordings all my life, and having concentrated on precisely these aspects of the interpretations I was listening to, I have a certain advantage here although there is always a tremendous challenge in deciding how you want it to sound. A true interpretation cannot be a copy. However much I admire a Furtwängler interpretation, I cannot copy it for the simple reason that it will not sound authentic. One has to be true to oneself. Thus, I avoid listening to recordings before a concert, unless it is to analyze a technical problem. I try to let the music unfold in my mind over and over so as to get my own sense of where it is going. Unfortunately, most musicians today spend all their time learning the technical aspects described above, but don’t think much about the ideas in the music. Many don’t even think that there are ideas in the music at all. Bruckner has been more fortunate than most composers in that the conductors who do Bruckner usually have deep involvement in his music. Beethoven, on the other hand has been thoroughly destroyed in the last 60-70 years.

Once you have decided how you think the music should sound, you then have to get the orchestra to sound that way. This, of course, is what rehearsals are for. In my experience, it is surprising how much of the “sound” happens spontaneously. Each conductor seems to generate a particular sound through body language and the way he raises and lowers his arm. Dynamics and balance usually require work. In this regard, having had no formal training, I have to find my own words to communicate what I want from the orchestra. A conductor friend of mine who has often seen me rehearse his orchestra (the Carabobo Symphony) tells me how he enjoys seeing me get what I want in rather unusual ways. Still, this is a struggle for me and I suffer tremendously in rehearsals.

It is interesting that sometimes I change a preconception as to how something should sound during the rehearsals when I find it sounds forced or doesn’t come out naturally. I remember some specific passages in the last movement of the Bruckner Eighth, which I did at a slower tempo than I had originally planned. The tempo relationships in this movement are particularly difficult!

During this whole process I often ask myself why I got myself into such a mess. It is fortunate that at the end of the concert there is usually great satisfaction. Ultimately, however, the greatest reward is how much one can learn about the works one interprets and how this learning can enrich one’s life.




"I wish I could score everything for horns." - Richard Wagner. "Our writing equipment takes part in the forming of our thoughts." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Page 1 of 1 (1 items) Select Pages: 
   Target    Threads for related reading   Most recent post in related threads   Forum  Replies   Views   Started 
  »  New  Bruckner, me and the Seventh..  From Memory...  Musical Discussions  Forum     81  461869  07-17-2007
Home Page  |  Last 24Hours  | Search  |  SiteMap  | Questions or Problems | Copyright Note
The content of all messages within the Forums Copyright © by authors of the posts