Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Joe Roberts wrote:

If you can't relate to individual personal enjoyment as an ultimate goal of audio, sorry Bud, I can't help ya.

Well, when you stick your finder, nose or whatever into a vise and someone will close the vise, coursing you pain and then someone will turn the vise’s se to the opposite direction opening the vise then you will experience the “personal enjoyment”. Sorry, my level of appreciation of the reselects that Audio is able to deliver is at a different level. I think it is different flor you as well but the “personal enjoyment” is the only one goal that you are tuned to sell.

Joe Roberts wrote:

I doubt you like what I like or listen to what I listen to. I'm a blues harmonica player.

I could guess something like this with very high certainty.

Joe Roberts wrote:

Since my motto is " Who cares what I like, make your own evaluations," I can understand how that can upset dogmatic spewers of topological laws and sharply-chiseled evaluation programs.

Ironically I seldom match the topological limitation with auditable result but rather I match the topological potencies with personal demands of listeners.  I have absolutely stunning absolutely accurate prediction.

Joe Roberts wrote:

In accordance with my deeply felt philosophy that one should do with audio whatever makes one happy, I certainly recognize and defend your right to think and do what you please. If you think inflexibility is cool, fine by me.

Yes, I would stick with my position of single-driver speaker as a tool that is able to satisfy very limited demant of audio reproduction. I appreciate that you allow me to maintain this opinion.

Joe Roberts wrote:

I was sort of dogmatic myself 25 years ago, before I became a public audio figure, but I grew out of it. Now I think anything that destroys dogma is far more valuable to the human race.

Valid view. Unfortunately what I express is not dogma but my position that based upon experience, exposure and actually my interest to the subject.

Joe Roberts wrote:

Puhleeze, don't act like I'm ready to run to Boston to hear your system and you are still thinking about whether I should be permitted, because as I implied above, I wouldn't travel to the next trailer park over to hear 99% of audio systems. I already heard 99% percent of audio systems, if you know what I mean. Sometimes it feels like I heard 110% of all audio systems.

OK, Joe, I have something to replay but where we go with it?  All of it has no relevancy nether to your Korean speaker nit to your virginity about the single-speaker drivers. About your blues-searching 110% of all audio systems… Do you remember the Saint-Exupéry's “Le Petit Prince” who was bitching about the grade with 1000000 roses?

Joe Roberts wrote:

I only wish you liked Sound Practices and sent me 20 bucks in 1998 so I could have stayed in business 15 minutes longer.

Do not get me wrong. I have bought a few years back from you the PDF file with all “Sound Practices” and it was OK read. Still, in the large scale it was as “important” as many other product-centric audio publications. You just had a different product and an ordinary audio Moron running dead Dynoaudio with 500W Krell read your “Sound Practices” and ended up with Altec and 2A3. However, Sound that person get is not a action of “tools” but a reflection of the listener's consciousness and from this perspective  the “Sound Practices” was no event in the processes of de-moranization of mostly idiotic audio public. So, as far as I concern the “Sound Practices” was a manual for "kinky soldering", nothing else.  I do admit you did have a very few interesting articles but you went nowhere with them, as you should…

Joe Roberts wrote:

Just to show there are no hard feelings, …

Ok, now I feel officially insulted!

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site