Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: Signal variation, noise, and effects on circuit topology
Post Subject: Index of ComponentsPosted by drdna on: 12/9/2008
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Paul S wrote:
Adrian, as a purely practical observation, I just re-read your examples of the format you suggest, and I have to say I would need a good deal more information than that before I could figure out enough of what was going on with the components in question to be able to make useful decisions for my own applications.
That may well be true. I am suggesting it on Romy's site because we all have fairly similar systems and ideas about audio. This may reduce such frustrations.

Again, the goal is to simply have observations, not a catalog of successes (e.g., the wonderful Capacitor X). Exactly the observations you refer to:

 Paul S wrote:
I find out that the tester either did not notice or he glossed over traits that I find important with respect to my own final decisions. So, I followed up on what I read, paid my money, did the damned DIY, and now I hear pretty much what he heard, only I hear other stuff, too, and/or I come to different conclusions about the relative weighting of the tester's observations.


This can be very fruitful, if you then elaborate on the application and how the device met or fell short of the goals. If we gain insight into the important attributes of various functional positions in a circuit toplogy, we can begin to predict what devices to use or consider novel toplogical solutions.

Adrian

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site