Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: Purist Audio Design vs. Purist Audio Design
Post Subject: The cable that I am playing now.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/21/2008
 Romy the Cat wrote: |
| I do not think that the fluid is a big deal. I think the fluidness of the isolation is the key, I would use different liquid. In my past I tried silicon and Scotch Whisky and the result was very good. Would it be possible to have even better sounding fluid then what Purist users? I think so. Purist puts their wires in plastic isolators and then submerges them in their fluid. I do not like it. I would like to have naked live conductors floating in fluid. Use none corrosive fluid for instance the silicon fluid in silicon tubing… I consulted with scientific-oriented person and he advised me to use different type of oil to live wires. Anyhow, although I am interested to learn what kind antifreeze of brake fluid Purist uses and even I have access to the infrared spectroscope but I would not go for analyzing the Purist’s fluid in RevA and RevB. I feel it would not be right thing to do. |
|
All my Purist semi-mimicking ideas of conductors floating in liquid are materialized in a cable that I am playing now with. It is a tube filed with grease or oil, sealed and RCA-terminated, ready to plug in play pair of those cables is available commercially at cost $25 in China.
I am not commenting on the sound of this cable at this point: first because the cable is too new and second because I do not want to. I am sick from visitors of my site who run across this site and send to me those emails in search for recommendations what to buy. I inform about my play with this Chinese Proteus only as information but not as recommendation.
Rgs, Romy the CatRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site