Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

I keep receiving emails asking me and complimenting me about this “Chernobyl Arm”. I have difficulties to estimate the worth of the entire project and the most important to pass the value of this worth to others.
 
The project was very valuable form a stand point of the getting best possible result form this “Korvet” arm but I do not know if it made sense from a point of view of getting a “better arm”. People keep asking me if this Chernobyl arm turned out to be better then some other arms that I like? I really do not know.

I have it now running with SPU Mono and I was not trying to conclude if it performs better then 3012 for instance. So, when I was saying that I go not know if it was rational to pursue the Chernobyl Arm I really meant this. You could go buy 3012 and would have a guarantied certain result without any problems or aggravations. To make the Chernobyl to work was a lot of pain. In the end of this pain - does it overperform the “defeat” 3012? I really do not know, furthermore I intentionally did not look the answer to this question. You see, beside the sexy look, and the impressive view of the Chernobyl arm there is it’s actual sound and this is the only things that mater…

I kind of begin to drift from myself when I was among “anyone who loves tonearms”. This abstract, manhood love to the tonearms really shadows the real result - the functional purpose of the tonearm – namely it’s sound. Subsequently, the Chernobyl arm was the first arm of mine when I agreed upon it’s sound without bothering to correlate it’s sound to other “better” arms. It works for me but I doubt that I would be good enough for others. Therefore I would like do not suggest to others that my Chernobyl arm worth the spent efforts. To me it was a labor of love and I am not convinced that I was objective, or wanted to be objective in my judgments about the Chernobyl arm’s sound.

Rgs,
Romy

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site