Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: How audio started….
Post Subject: Re: To hear a ‘reference’ system is educational but not necessary.Posted by Antonio J. on: 1/25/2005

abortion clinics in ny

buy abortion pill

cheap abortion pill buy online

cheap abortion pill damske.com
 Romy the Cat wrote:


Anthony, not really.

I have been pitching for the years a concept that the answers in audio are NOT located in audio and that the entire audio actually starts form a library (it it’s metaphorical definition). I had been implying about the “librarian” derivation of audio for years at AA and at few other pleaces but those hoodlums vigorously deleted each post that suggested this "superb audiophilic hereticy": to use different out-of-audio intellectual and spiritual sources in order to conduct audio analyses.  This vision is presumably contradict with thier definition of audio… I do not wont to go further explaining their motivation because it will be too brutal.

I kind of keep mentioning that all this information have already was presented and then vandalized by the AA’s dirt because it was a lot of efforts and a lot of time spent in past to share those concepts with others. However, I think the fact that a domination majority audio Idiots (so colorfully presented within most of the internet forums) considers what the above-mentioned issues are a hereticy and foolishness is a wonderful illustration what kind people presented in audio  and what objectives they have.

The Cat



I agree that the answers IN MUSIC are not located in audio, but I really don't get the point about the answers IN AUDIO not being in it. Maybe they're in the music and the music you listen to. In spite of being too brutal, I'd like reading the motivation if you had the time. As I see it, audio is just a tool which allows you to enjoy further and deeper in the music you want to listen to. A good system to me is the one that allows me to forget about sonics and plays just plain music, leaving me with the same kind of "carelessness" (is this english?), freedom to listen, and motivating my willing to understand the work if I'm capable of it. The more complex and "highend" is a system, the less I feel compeled to listen and trying to understand the music, at least this happens with speakers mostly.

I arrived to AA later than you tried to share your points of view about all this, and I missed the "interesting points", but I could see how they deleted your posts without any especial motivation. I found them interesting, refreshing and presenting a different perspective about all this audio nonsense. Although they were too crytical with the "statement" and that was something they couldn't stand. Many people in those forums are there just to feed their egos receiving raves about their systems, and all the talk is about irrelevant points on sound and sonics. But it's not easy getting some clues in this world with all that biased and out of the real topic comments and publicity. I don't blame on most of the hobbists, but on the industry and the "writers" supporting all that bussiness. Everything spins around money, not music, nor "good sound for music". But this is the World and age we're living :-(

I think I know what I'd like to achieve, and I know it might be feasible, but I still don't know how to do it. I think that in spite not being necessary to listen a "reference" system (regarding music, not sound or audiophiles opinions) would "educate" me quite a lot.

Cheers,

A

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site