Anthony, not really.
I have been pitching for the years a concept that the answers in audio are NOT located in audio and that the entire audio actually starts form a library (it it’s metaphorical definition). I had been implying about the “librarian” derivation of audio for years at AA and at few other pleaces but those hoodlums vigorously deleted each post that suggested this "superb audiophilic hereticy": to use different out-of-audio intellectual and spiritual sources in order to conduct audio analyses. This vision is presumably contradict with thier definition of audio… I do not wont to go further explaining their motivation because it will be too brutal.
I kind of keep mentioning that all this information have already was presented and then vandalized by the AA’s dirt because it was a lot of efforts and a lot of time spent in past to share those concepts with others. However, I think the fact that a domination majority audio Idiots (so colorfully presented within most of the internet forums) considers what the above-mentioned issues are a hereticy and foolishness is a wonderful illustration what kind people presented in audio and what objectives they have.
The Cat |