Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: Macondo's Axioms: Horn-loaded acoustic systems
Post Subject: How to "flood" the crossover pointPosted by Romy the Cat on: 8/5/2007
stuck.wilson wrote: |
In this thread, you previously said--
12) If a filter requires a phase inversion then it is preferable to flood crossover point with amplitude and do not invert phase.
What exactly do you mean by this and how's it work? |
|
It is it not a widely used method and some, particularly academia-type people would consider it heresy. However, I do not think that there is such a thing as heresy it heresy delivers better result.
The crossovers of higher order (second) introduced 180 degree phase shift and it is a common practice to use opposite polarity of bottom and top channels. However, in some instances (not all time, and I never was able to successfully implement with tweeters) I came to observations that even use of polarity-inventing crossover but without physical reversing of polarity does serve positive results. Without reversing polarity and use of 180 degree phase shift we will have a suck out at crossover point. Nevertheless, in context of multichannel installation, where each driver works in a narrow range, it is possible to increase amplitude of one channel, and by means of it to flood-out the sucked-out at crossover porn. Interesting that this methodology still might have some residual none-linearity of response but there is something more important than linearity. If forget about linearity and to use imaging-centric crossover building techniques than in some cases the benefits of none-inversion are clearly auditable. In fact, I believe I have written on my sides about that before.
The method was not invented by me, it rather my common sense know-how that I recognize as part of normal design process. Initially it was implemented by Yamaha loudspeaker in the end off 70s, and its was were I took the inspiration from. Later own looking at others people’s “better” crossover designing techniques (that have little to do with what books suggest) and discovering my own channels integration techniques I recognized that no-inversion method should not be take out of consideration, and if it is employable then it should be utilized.
Rgs, the CatRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site