Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Melquiades Amplifier
In the Thread: The one-stage Melquiades.
Post Subject: It is exactly why I’m looking amorphous chunk for Bud….Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/1/2007

 Paul S wrote:
One thing I noticed right away was a certain "image density", not unlike the ML2.

This is very interesting subject. I do not know what core the ML2.0 used but I would like to have ML2 a little bit  “amorphousised”…. To me it one of the things that I feel the ML2 was missing – it has dynamically limited and was able to play wild and violent when Music is called upon. It was in was over polite and overly gracious. Mostly it was desirable but when the opposite was vital then ML2 faced it’s limitations.

 Paul S wrote:
Another interesting quality is absolutely unflappable dynamics, with no hint of saturation, and no harmonic shifting, compression, smearing, or thinning with speed, SPL or  complexity; in other words, pretty much what you said.

I do not know how about the “harmonic shifting” – I have no way to assess it. also I do not know how about the saturation  it is not the property of the core maters but other things also with the core materials. However but in terms of dynamics, speed and ability to do go apart at SPL max the amorphous core that I have seen are so farther then regular steal that I feel that any person who ever touched a amorphous core transformer would hardly look back to regular silicon still. This is what I try to drag Bad from the world of the silicon misery to the realms of the amorphous nirvana.. :-) OK, not he also hates me… :-)

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site