Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

guy sergeant wrote:

Which would you rather try to get good sound from Romy? These or Magico Mini's?

I realy do not understated the essence of this comment. If it is a good sound then what the hell different if it came form 73-year old speakers or form Magico Mini? The very same is with the poor sound: if it is sound like shit then what is the difference if it was Klangfilm of Magico?

Any loudspeaker sound bad because the specific mistake. A loudspeaker might sound good without know for a given party reason but it never sound bad without the poor sound to be a direct consequence of the very specific errors that were made. In case of the Magico and case of the given Klangfilm those “errors” exist. Sure, they are different errors. Also, no one said that a loudspeaker must sound good and to be free from “terminal errors” (in context of own topology). However, the point I was trying to make is that those Klangfilms, regardless of the primitive sound and regardless of “unnecessary errors” have a stupid fetish among audio people and I really do not like it. (Magico has own stupid fetish but it comes from other direction that is not the subject of the thead)

BTW, if some one would like to point out where from your point of view ate troubles in THIS Klangfilm system then feel free to share it.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site