Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: Does horn surface porosity influence sound ?
Post Subject: Here’s where the fault with “correlateable perceived quality” goes…Posted by Romy the Cat on: 2/12/2007
be wrote: |
It is wrong to conclude from: " By the way, the listening tests performed by Keith Holland confirmed that in blind listening tests of various commercial horns, the material, wood, metal, fibreglass, etc was not correlateable with perceived quality. Knotty or not! " - That Keith Holland does not think that the horn material has influence on sound quality. |
|
'Be', certainly you have a appoint here; however I would like to point out also a few things. First: Keith Holland used a blind listening test that is one of the inductions of a low listening intelligence. Second, Keith Holland (as said) used “various commercial horns” the means he used already finished horns. It is absolutely unintelligent to take two or more different commercial horns and juts listening them to make any conclusions about surface or materials…
Paul S wrote: |
It seems like we've gotten several posts recently that take me back to the AA guy who wrote enthusiastically about …. |
|
Yes, there are quite a lot of absolutely moronic posts/threads ay my site lately. It does not please me. I hope the posters will use own self-control and do not upload “empty post” with undeveloped context. My general recommendation is that if one feels that his post does not deserved to be mapped to the “Knowledge Tree ™ then do not even make this post…
The CatRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site