Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: Magico Mini or Jonathan Valin maxi?
Post Subject: Re: It WAS the correct link.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 8/10/2006
 Telus wrote: |
| I followed this link since I wanted to learn more about the different viewpoints and counterpoints but I couldn't find any of the posts to which you refer. Is this the correct link? |
|
It was a correct link but the collection of the posts regarding of the subject was deleted. Ironically it was nothing dangers in there, quite opposite it was educational and exposed the ways in which the simpleton Jonathan Valin is thinking. The half of the Jonathan post was his disbelief that I ever heard magico and another part was his doubts about my metal competence. It was kind of predictable: boring BS with no substance. Particularly it was predicable the fact that Jonathan was not able to address/confirm a single deception he expressed in the beginning of his review: these wring fools copy the text from the manufacturers marketing booklets into this articles with even having brain to comprehend what they copy. I said the “beginning of his review “ as I did not read to the end and have no idea what he said it there later on or even do not know if he likes the speaker. I do not think that the review ever would be published if he did not.
BTW, Amphissa, point out to the wonderful article the might be fin to read in the context of the subject:
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/entertainment/columns/article_1234143.php
Still, the article more portrays the industry but not necessary the Valin. I do not feel that Jonathan is corrupted in a way or internally fraudulent but his is just too simplistic, naïve and easy to please and not demanding. BTW, it is well know in industry and many people take advantage of it.
Anyhow, I have the very last post that I’ve posted into the thread that I’m copping in here:
I kind of thought to reply but it looks like there is no subject anymore in this thread and there is no valuable thoughts expected in here, the thoughts that worth any attention. There are many reasons why I frequently do not read the reviews to the end – because in 90% of the cases those “writers” contradict (without even knowing it) in their later paragraphs the BS that they have expressed in their first paragraphs. The same is here. A few post ago the big time reviewers was ridiculing and mocking how horrible horns sound and hot weak SETs are and then he admit the he is never familiar horns and that he surprise, surprise did came across a SET that did well for whatever reasons. However, Jonathan ridiculed me and used my, based upon Horns and SETs familiarity with reproduced sound, as my ignorant labiality. So, what was Jonathan’s ridicule is beside his self-ridicule? But how different would it be from the rest that Jonathan have expressed in this thread?
In the end the subject is be left opened and not even discussed, as Jonathan is unable to address the subject. I can see that he’s wiling to discredit an opponent in case the opponent degrees with him, or he suggest a need to see a doctor… But all this affords to support his status quo do not adreess anything about the actual results that Magico delivers, say nothing about the specific deceptions that Jonathan has expressed in his articles, at least it it’s beginning as I did not read it to the end.
I agree with Jonathan that is this thread I very much expressed my very legitimate “Romy the Catness”. I never seen myself hiding and I never seen myself blemishing. It is what it is and I would be glad of some of people who do follow this thirsted would get a message from me. The message is that the recent hype of admiration of the Magico Mini is actual not a view but a diagnoses – or the sign the sign of the very severe sick peruse into a domain of the very “different” sound reproduction objectives.
As I said above I have nothing against Valin, he is a lightweight audio-Vini-Pu who like we all entertain himself with audio subjects. I do not feel any seriousness, involvedness or rational in his views but why should I? Perhaps my practice do not to kiss in assed any budged cretin sound atypical at this TAS forum but the point is not about me, or not even about Mr. Valin. The point is that the very few of you “might” on the site, somewhere in peripheral of your metal vision, might care an impression and message that the Magico Mini, along with many other recent audio products, presents a unique sonic vision that is IDENTIFIABLE. If you do not get it now, then you do not get it but it you do reach sometime a point in your audio development when you suddenly begin to “get it” then you will understand why I wasted my time posting at TAS forum.
In the end, I would like to express appreciation to the folks who run the forum. It is a common practice within the industry sponsored public forums that any controversial content get vandalized. In this case the guys who run the site did demonstrated integrity and tolerance. This is great and as the resule the readers got more diversified views on the subject of the Magico monitors.”
Rgs,
Romy the Cat
PS: How little I knew expending my credits to the people who ran that site….
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site