Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Remedies the Beauty
Post Subject: Nowadays I convinced in oppositePosted by Romy the Cat on: 11/28/2021
Funny, with me, the formula has not really changed since the mid 70s - a plausible reconstruction for row 15 listening
Ironically, this is exactly what lately I advocate against. And this is a very important message that I would like to delegate. In my view reconstruction or better to say reinstating of auditable environment for row 15 is only Sonic other objective and I believe it is very secondary our objective. We are operating under presumption that if we put a subject (listener) in the similar environment where he or she can receive the same messages as during life event then it automatically assure success of audio event. I feel it is wrong, or would this way it is not completely right. I can give you a dozens examples which proves it. The simplest would be you sitting at row 15 and somebody who is not familiar with classical repertoire at all. Both of you will be receiving in your seats The identical musical messages but the audio communication event will have different results for you and a little informed person.
Think about a concept that a regular person and a great writer can express. One person pass a data about the subject of writing and another person create a long-lasting memorable artistic impressions. The very same with playback. Different playbacks have different capacity to impregnate sonic messages with artistic payload. I know something how to make playback to sound good but I am not informed how to make amplifier or speaker to enriched audio sound with imaginative values. This is exactly my problem with my Macondo. I can make it sound supposedly beautiful but I do not know which gear to lubricate an order make sound more artistically potent. This is exactly why I grabs this Dannoy opportunity as for some reason it is more artistically capable.
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site