Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: Mid-bass Hornresp (V51.30) simulations
Post Subject: Some boring design philosophy.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/23/2021
I was cooking a dinner today for my kids and they asked me if
any taste difference between ice-tea in Donkin and Starbucks. In my head popup
an association with this thread. The
same with the horns. I do not know the difference, but it certainly exists.
Now, an interesting question: as we identified the difference then will the difference
be manifest itself in the final sound? Let pretend that it will and let pretend
that the author of the system speaks perfect audio language and was able to build
a complete installation just around the difference between those two types of
the horns. What this type of the system would say about design objectives? When
we build our playbacks, we are trying to manufacture sound and to navigate our sensation
as the result of our exposure to the sound. We do not build all playback as
topological consequences. I admit, we could but in my view, it is a dead end, guess
how I know…
So let's reformulate the question thus those two versions of
tratrix horns have any psycho acoustic differences is that worth to capitalize.
Or even let me too complicated, if those differences exist then how to make
those difference transparent in the context of entire installation. I very much
not trying to do the things more complicated but to answering this question in
practical terms, considering everything I said above, I feel that it should not
be differences worth any practical attention. while we designing our
installation with hundred cycles horn, we are dealing with so many other
aspects that actually have many tangible impact to sound that if a person care
about versus of two tratrix then he have addressed everything else. it is my
sincerely believe that if person have addressed anything else then he would not
care about tratrix differences. Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site