 martinshorn wrote: | | I expected your disappointed resonance already.
What you write completes the impression of the evening. I didn't go that far
not to blow up the mini article unnecessarily. But be honest, you knew it all
before. And so it happened... And I believe deep inside you remembered yourself
back in the days when you were searching, the moment you responded to my
"self-invitation". |
|
Josh, I have no disappointing
in here of any kind with exception that I wish you do not post at the forums where
the typical idiots dump dirt on me and I have no means to response. In fact I
am very pleased with your visit as in my view Macondo demonstrate a very high performing
integrity. You mentioned that you were surprised that Macondo sounded like a regular
speaker, you were not moves, astonished, surprised, flabbergasted or experienced
any other emotional shock that you typically expect to get from a playback. This
is the highest compliment I even got for Macondo. This is the ultimate expressive
transparency of playback, the transparency that you unfortunately do not understand
yet. Macodno did present you with auditable surrogate that in your mind you recognize
as a definition of “quality”. You did not understand the music was played and
you experienced no invents for your soul. When you played your surrogate
Macondo did not ornament it with your expected sonic goodness, so you pass through
the Macondo presentation like a hot knife there the butter and hear only a
boring regular speaker. There are very few speakers out there that can do it
for you and Macondo is one of them.
Also, I think Macondo did spectacular
job to suggest you do not look for “progressed” solution and to settle down for
something more modest. I think it was a good education at good time for you and
I do glad that you come to this realization.
|
|