Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio Discussions
In the Thread: Audio treasure find
Post Subject: It is OK.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 1/30/2019
 Sound22Card wrote:
I am VERY thankful to you for the info, ...sincerely, ... but not for the 'attitude'.  My taste in music, which is very varied, is not in question here.  I also did not say I was going to enhance the speakers.  I said the others, who knew more, might want to.  As to what I read, again, it is not the subject here.

Sound22Card, I express no “attitude” in my post but rather my long standing position. The rowuk  is correct about the fact the music you mentioned does not have the musical wealth to be discriminated by higher or lower quality playback. Not that it is “bad music” and I imply anything about your personal taste or preference. It is just not a material, in purely audio sense, that would allow people interact and to have any common scene of listening values.   It is also the material that has no expressive complexity or any kind sonic demands. I know that you do not understand what it all means and I sound to you like a snobbish jerk. It very much might be so but let me give you an association that might illustrate my point of view. Pretend that you burn some very specific hallucinogenic insects in a very septic way in order to very narrow navigate the direction of your hallucinogenic trip. Then somebody observe your action and concludes that the burn smoke itself is your objective and that sniffing the smoke of an automobile exhaust is a similar activity.  My standing is that M Jackson has as much relationship to a needs for a better audio as your consideration what king motor oil to put in a care in order your exhaust sniffing to become more “productive”. My apology for the stupidity of the example and perhaps for the inaccuracy: I know very little about artificial stimulants but insists that the quintessence of the example is quite accurate.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site