Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: The open project: a lateral cross-injection.
Post Subject: The art of audio thinking.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 4/6/2013
fiogf49gjkf0d
 steverino wrote:
My point is not that separation per se must always be maintained but that the character of the music determines the degree of optimum separation or co-location. For example the first violins are grouped together for a reason so the individual string tones blend. The location of the second violins is more discretionary but certain compositions benefit from one location or the other (the two possible sites are in back of the first violins or across from them on the right side of the stage. Two different sonic effects.  The melodic, harmonic, dynamic and instrumentation attributes created by the composer always imply a certain kind of spatial arrangement in live performance to reproduce them satisfactorily. Even on a recording an artificial arrangement should be based on those factors  in addition to any directions from the composer, producer etc. It's called mixing.

Steverino, yes, that all understood but I was taking about slightly different things. Present that there is no spatial intend in music. Let pretend that we have a single flute plays in anechoic chamber, I know it is disgusting but let pretend it for methodological reasons. Even then we still have audio payback do phases processing and the virtual imaging of spatial reconstruction will be there. So, what I advocate is that we shall not confuse the musical or actual spatial information with spatial information as audio debugging tool. Sure they are related but I think that “art of audio thinking” is to be able to separate between importance of spatial reality and specifics of spatial reconstruction of reality.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site