Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Audio News
In the Thread: A primer on high-end marketing: Wilson XLF
Post Subject: About Wilson XLF by Robert HarleyPosted by Romy the Cat on: 1/4/2012
fiogf49gjkf0d


Robert Harley wrote I his blog about his listening of the XLF.

http://www.avguide.com/blog/wilson-s-new-xlf-flagship-loudspeaker-world-exclusive-preview

The Robert’s article is hilarious.  He compiled all imaginable meaningless descriptions of Sound that the retarded audiophiles are accustomed to recognize as “reasons to buy” and damped the reasons in his article.  I am sure that his idiots-colleague will cope and paste the “phrases” form Harley posts into their stupid writings, the way how they brainlessly do for years, breading the meaningless crap they write.

I was very taken but his comments about the “dramatically better sounding in the midrange”. I wonder: why a few years ago when Wilson introduced the Alexandria he did not report the “underperforming midrange”? At that time I did listen the Alexandria and I did report that MF has problems. Where was the Robert Harley “expertise” at that time? In a contrary, Mr. Harley was grooving over himself at that time very much as he does now, defecating from his mouth meaningless adjectives.  It is clear the if the new XLF has “dramatically better midrange” then the old Alexandria has “dramatically worse midrange”. Why this problem with midrange the “expert” Robert Harley was not able to recognize before?

Well, do not ask yourself the above question too hard as it all meaningless. Robert Harley does what all young girls in strip joins do – daily wave the asses, arch the backs, and pull underwear out. The next 2 years passed, Wilson made a next recursive model, light up the switch and said to his ordinary suspect strippers: “Fetch!” So, Robert went to do what Robert do, to publicize that the new endeavored deserver distribution and purchase. I wonder if he does not get bored from himself.

It is not that I claim that Wilson XLF has no new qualities that deserve or not deserve to be considers. I have no businesses to do those claims. I however absolutely insist in gross disqualification of the meaninglessness and emptiness that Robert Harley has expressed about Wilson XLF.

A good question: why in such case I do pay attention of public to the Robert Harley’s next verbal brain fart.  Good question. You see, Robert Harley is a top echelon of strippers and Wilson XLF is one of the leaders of TAS-pushed Sound. Tomorrow you will see that the very same attitude and the very same language will be filtered down to the lower tier of the writing whores. All those pips of the lovers level who defibrillate to live all those Kharmas (are’t they gone yet?), Magico (the most horrible crap imaginable), MBL (with potency of a rooster after castration), Aerial (do I need to say?), Revel (with smell of marble statute), Schweikert (is it Schweikert  or Schicklgruber?) will be model their literature idiocy after Robert/Wilson model, will model in the way how they do for years. It is not that Robert Harley is some kind of “leader” just they idiots who work in the indicts are too restricted to invent anything ne and the will brainlessly replicate what was done before them. So, in a way by this post I am complaining with the name of the thread: a primer on high-end marketing.

Rgs, Romy The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site