Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Be careful: Imaging vs. Compression
Post Subject: Re: DPOLS: why their sound worst...Posted by hifitodd on: 11/8/2005
abortion pill online
abortion pill online
tecomed.es
I am interested in how you personally discovered dpols for your own personal reference. You Say:
"Actually it is not
really correct because if you approach the DPoLS from the position of
“tweaking” then you NEVER discover it and never learn how the Points
work. The DpoLS hardly might be discovered by accident or by tweaking
but rather by the intentional and premeditated pursuit."
You then go on to say:
"If you did not
experience (mostly audio people never did) a playback installation in
the DpoLS then you certainly might accept is as a religion."
If this is the case, then how did you first come about dpols?
Given that DPoLS cannot be "stumbled upon".
Romy, I am a little confused by what you mean when you said:
"I juts
would like to remind that desires to get ANY science evidences
are juts the desires of convince own mental applicability.."
Do you feel that way about everything audio related? You
obviously have very firm-rooted opinions of rights/wrongs in audio, and
you must feel as though there are physics-related reasons why you feel
the way you do.
You then say:
"However, a creative
sensibility of and a person ability to recognize the realty and react
to realty accordingly is a real high ends of human actions."
Actually, I may be starting to see your point now that I am starting at
your thoughts in isolation. You mean that physics clearly
coincides with reality, but that's not the point. The point is
what is real/not real, regardless of data, and a person's ability and
motivation to work with reality using live music as a frame of
reference is all that matters.
drdna - You say:
"I never thought of DPOLS as special. This is the way I have always set up my speakers."
With all due respect... I don't think you're talking about DPoLS...
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site