Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Be careful: Imaging vs. Compression
Post Subject: DPOLS and the science of us.Posted by Romy the Cat on: 11/7/2005
buy venlafaxine 75 mg
buy venlafaxine
online uk
hifitodd wrote: |
Frankly, from my perspective your stance on DPoLS mirrors that of the typical audio-moron voodooism. Here is some essentially non-obtainable state that when realized will make the listener "hypotized" by thew newfound musical "significance". DPoLS one day, intelligent chips that work their "quantum voodoo" the next day. |
|
I disagree with you. First of all I have nothing to do with the "quantum voodoo" and as far as I remember I always was very vocal critic of it. The DpoLS is not a “newfound musical significance" but the only existing ways to get the “real audio sound”. Some people use it for years and years and some people consider it as “newfound”. The reasons why I made it available is because someone who does not know yet might learn about the DpoLS….
hifitodd wrote: |
The only difference between your DPoLS and many other "mystical" audio tweaks is that yours is non-feasible to reproduce. I can place the chip on top of my CD player and tell you in within a short matter of time that the significance of the event has not changed, but a personal experment to prove/disprove DPoLS would take months of endless tweaking/refining. |
|
Actually it is not really correct because if you approach the DPoLS from the position of “tweaking” then you NEVER discover it and never learn how the Points work. The DpoLS hardly might be discovered by accident or by tweaking but rather by the intentional and premeditated pursuit.
hifitodd wrote: |
In my current state of audio/music/listener interaction knowledge acquisition I am of course cautious, and I believe in science-backed evidence as opposed to religion. |
|
I do not think that you use the “science-backing” is this case appropriately. If you did not experience (mostly audio people never did) a playback installation in the DpoLS then you certainly might accept is as a religion. However, if you have very personal and very tangible witnessing what happen with playback when it hits the DpoLS then you do not need any “voices from the burring bushes” and you become not just a “believer” but a person who use the DpoLS as a regular expressive tool.
hifitodd wrote: |
So my question is this: Just what exactly IS DPoLS, as described by the physics that it operates on. Your thread describes what happens when DPoLS is obtained, but I am not able to find any data around why it exists, and what it is in actuality. |
|
You will not find any data about it anywhere because what was proposed in the article above is way much more advanced that the understanding of the people who create “data” in audio.
Rgs,
Romy the Cat
Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site