Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Horn-Loaded Speakers
In the Thread: Macondo’s lowest channel.
Post Subject: Erratum ( or errata if you insist)Posted by oxric on: 3/12/2011
fiogf49gjkf0d
 oxric wrote:


 RF at Ona wrote:

Now the same issues and analysis applies to your woofer towers and with the new placement of the towers some of these effects may have become exposed.

If these effects are significant than your new wider spaced ULF towers might actually be functioning more effectively in their upper range than the midbass horns in their lower range on stereo recordings with phase differences between the channels in this frequency range.



I am not too clear about 'their upper range.' Do you mean that the lower range of the ULF towers are in principle compromised because this is an area where they overlap the upper range of the mid-bass channel and therefore the area where we have in-phase summation and out-of-phase cancellation (across the whole 42-500Hz of the mid-bass channels I would say)?



The last part in italic is based on an incorrect reading of your comment quoted here. The whole paragraph should be scrapped to read:

I am not too clear about 'their upper range' of the ULF towers functioning 'more effectively'. Do you mean that the ULF towers do not suffer from cancellation (because of positioning and distance apart) to the same degree as the mid-bass horns in this same range because of the cancellation issues mentioned earlier, and this results in the former making up for the weakness in the latter?

Regards
Rakesh

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site