Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Melquiades Amplifier
In the Thread: Single-stage Melquiades vs. DHT amps
Post Subject: Me and my DHT references…Posted by Romy the Cat on: 11/22/2010
fiogf49gjkf0d

I was pointed at a site where people debating the subject of 2A3 vs. 45 vs. AD1 vs. RN604 vs. YO168.  Naturally they pointed out to my site, bringing my articles from this thread on the same subject as some kind of reference.

I read their comments and felt extremely uncomfortable that those people refer to my experience without any understanding the specifics of my application. This is what drive me nut on internet – the people are just a bunch of superficial buffoons why see death of the subject no further then 12 read word and 2 pictures.

The reality is that my experience with DHT is absolutely irrelevant to the most of the people. I use DHT in DSET application and my DHT tube works in very limited bandwidth, with very specific load and with no challenge of power or class A2 operation. My discovery about the best sound from my DHT shall be view ONLY from the perspective how it benefits my MF, or the channels the site in Macondo between this specific tweeter and this specific fundamental channels. T is highly possible that my finding about the sound the DHT tubes that I tried relevant to no one. The fact that I find that  YO168wols much more interring then any RN604, PX4 or 45 absolutely does not mean the a Moron driving his single Lowther or  Fostex from his full-range SET would come to the similar conclusions. What whatever it worth I would never use YO168 for a full range application, but this is a while other subject.

The point is: application, application and one more time application. He stupid Goggling and stupid quoting of others, without understanding what others are trying to do would not help. It never will, thankfully

The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site