Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Hifiapart, I did not accuse you personally in collecting, and I appreciate your retort about me unfortunately exhibiting collecting inclinations. However, the conversation is not about me, you or about Srajan personally. I am sure he is an OK guy and you or me would be gladly sitting with him in a bar, drink vodka and teas women. The point is not who Srajan is but what he is and what he represents. Unfortunately he represents audio nothingness, sort of audio-jellyfish that drifts with a flow of comfortable numbness, with a current of convenient status quo, without a realization if that current was the Gulfstream or it was a gravity flow in catacomb’s sewerage. I do not want to sharp my pencil against Srajan, as he is just a little stinky gear on a large machinery of general idiotization of audio. He does not understand his place and his role and his stand poison his own outlook as much as it poisons the horizons of thee people who read his crap…

I personally meeting people who do audio always divide them mentally on two categories – people who do audio accidentally and people who practice audio consciousnessly. With all pornographic pomposity that 6 moon brew around itself I do consider Srajan as very accidental audio person. He has no reasons to do audio and no motivations to practice audio journalism. If the circumstance changes Srajan will be publishing a magazine about breading of rabbits. I do not like it and I do not like that each Srajan article is saturated with critical mass of nothingness. You see, there is nothing wrong to be a Fox News and falsify data. Even this indicates motivation in one or another direction. It is much more unpleasant if a news anchor reads for you a news about let say 9/11 event or landing on moon  and has no idea what he is reading and what does it mean. 

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site