Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site
In the Forum: Playback Listening
In the Thread: Listening rooms and composers.
Post Subject: Many hypotheses avalabvle….Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/17/2010
fiogf49gjkf0d
 unicon wrote: |
| Romy can you explain the differences between a Bruckner room and Bach room ?(technically) Im all new in this subject. rooms are a part of audio playback to transparent audio waves in my idea and no more. |
|
I wish I could. I have hypotheses however.
Bach, if he is properly played, is perfect arrangement of time and sonority. Bach is an ultimate staccatotist and his “logic” derives mostly from sequencing of individuals micro and macro events. Bruckner lives in legato domain and his “logic” is in not in sequencing of sonority but in fluctuation of sonority. Think about it like longitudinal waves for Bruckner and transverse wave for Bach.
So I think in “Transverse Bach” time is more intuitive then in Bruckner and therefore Bach and Bruckner have different demands for “space”. The Bach’s space is more linear and properly algorithmable, it is too perfect and sometime it is too much of perfection. Bruckner’s space is ever-changing substance where each practical of the space live own life, still fluctuating by some devilish hyperbolic formula. Think about Rayleigh Surface motion what top and bottom are randomly flipping…
Oh, yeas, one more hypothesis: my playback nowadays perform too bad to play Bruckner.
The CatRerurn to Romy the Cat's Site