Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

This is kind of shit that I hate.  I went to AA and read a person said:

“Don't miss the CAR room... That would be Classic Audio Reproduction. But that's only if they are showing the same basic design as last year, which uses modified JBL drivers. They are using field coils and beryllium diaphragms on the horns and a JBL cone driver of some kind for the reflex bass with field coil added as well. The older versions of their speakers used awful sounding TAD drivers for both the compression drivers and the reflex bass. Not any more!”

The very same person the very few years parsed the Classic Audio Reproduction and one of the reasons according to him was the used of the “magnificent TAD drivers”.

I do not make any positive or negative comments about the nether the CAR speakers, nor about the TAD drivers, nor about JBLs, not about the berylliumed field-coils.  But I do make negative comments about the easiness with wish audio people dive into idiotic judgments.  Again, the 34083863rd time on this site:

http://www.goodsoundclub.com/Forums/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=432

, if so, then why the same person,  for years worshiping the Classic Audio Reproduction WITH TAD drivers, never pointed out the specific sonic problems that he supposedly recognizes in TAD… before he learned about other drivers? I do hate this level of “audio intelligence”

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site