Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Petrasescu_Lucian,

I perfectly understand your sentiments. There are unquestionable differences in operation between 1050 and 2000 but I do not know if it is the differences due to the topological differences or due to implantation differences. Topologically the APS never was clear what they do and their explanations I found in some case very confusing or even illogical.

I less care about the APS be able to give more than power line can handle, most of my electronics run in class A, has a stable current draw. But you are absolutely right – if this is correct then it is a semi-indication how the buttery if being used in the APS unit.

I said the semi-indication because it is not clear what the ASP software does. It is possible that when the wall power in palace then ASP’s oscillator and amplifier runs from the wall power and secondary circuit just changes the battery. Then when ASP software recognized that the wall power was lost for let sat 1/20 of period then it sources the power from buttery. Not owe would know what is going on and the APS is very not clear about it.

My interest to know it following. If the APS works as I described in the paragraph above then the buttery does not filter/buffer the source of ASP’s oscillator and amplifier. In this case I would like to get rid of the buttery and do not let the APS circuits (allegedly faulty made) of the buttery charging to affect my sound. I do not care about the blackout – the fear of them is just APS marketing fantasy. If the APS do source oscillator and amplifier from buttery regardless if the buttery is being charged or not then the buttery acts as a perfect capacitive tank and the buttery is good think. In this case we just need to wait until APS will finish to purify what they currently do, hoping not introducing any new problems…

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site