Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Bud, yes and no. They are right and the ultra high frequencies do pass any capacitors, indictors and transformers and I am attractive to the idea of filtering somehow by using the skin effect, I fins it is VERY elegant. The problem is that I do not know if it is possible. The LossLess peoples look like believe that by applying some kind of special isolators right next to the outer layer of conductor they can remove the outer layer from the cable and consequentially the higher frequencies. It makes theoretical sense but I do not think that it is possible.

My major problem with LossLess is not with their claim but with the fact that they provide as a prove of their filtration method the comments of dozens uses from web. I am sorry but it is idiotic! This cable might of not might sound good for zillion other reasons, my interest is about the filtration effect. If the objective filtration effect does exist by LossLess know-how then I would not mind to order from LossLess a couple meters of hook up cable to rewire the PP2000’s feed from amplifiers to output sockets. All those conversation would be over if to drive the LossLess cable with let say 100-800mHz generator and to see on a fast scope if any filtration effect exist compare to the zip cord with the same connectors.

I have to say that LossLess explanations do sound a bit amateurish and more design for pop-culture consumption.  For instance then forget to address the facts the current does not flow in conductor at all but in the magnetic field around the conductor. It does not change the rule of the game – we still treat the outer edge of the field differently then the inner edge of the field. How do it that is the really big question. I thought about it in past when I was experimenting with feedback techniques and used for open loop a shielded cable where the center core was forward signal and shield cared feedback…

Anyhow, I have no idea what LossLess in fact does and how valuable their claims. I read a few comments LossLess use as “review” at their site and it was a typical audiophile’s non-responsible and irrational chitchat.

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site