Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site

Paul,

I do not have any reasons to say anything about bias regarding any other tubes beside the 6C33C.

The point that I was trying to make the most of the people out there do not have a proper load for this CE amplifiers. They feel that when thier SETs sound loud enough in thier listing rooms then it is sufficient enough. In fact nothing could be further from the “truth”. SETs with dull speakers have no transients, no speed and no “juice” sound – it is how 90% of all SETs sound out there. As soon we begin to drive SETs harder to punch our dead acoustics then SET stopped to be SET sound-vise and become to be a “wishful thinking based upon a single-ended topology”. What I was saying that the beauty of the 6C33C is that when this tube gets a barbarian drive the anode go in thermo instability…. and this is perfectly fine because the tube do not sound well with this particular load anyhow. If a person have no ears then by looking at the anode of the 6C33C the person can use his vision to realize the his dead speakers should be more suitable for Krell or Mark Levisohn amplifiers but not 6C33C-based SET. My very approximant and base-on-nothing estimate suggested that with 6C33C, using both plates, it is nice take out of it no more then ~ 3-4W. All the rest should be gained by the sensitively of the speakers.

So, the boys who take from thier amps full 15-18W and complain about the 6C33C’s instability should change loudspeakers of move to smaller rooms. Both of the solutions are beneficial from VERY multiple perspectives.

Rgs,
The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site