Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site


In the Forum: Melquiades Amplifier
In the Thread: Single-stage Melquiades vs. DHT amps
Post Subject: How to test the DH tubes properly?Posted by Romy the Cat on: 5/21/2009
fiogf49gjkf0d
 Romy the Cat wrote:

I always was kind of afraid of it. Any single zillion years tube I see is “NOS in box”, “measured as new” or “never work”. So, I wonder where those uses up old tubes are gone? Do people trash them or juts sell them “as new”. As many old tubes I ever bought with quoted transconductance figures never were the same after I received the tubes I am not even talking about “match tubes” what is always is a pure BS, they never matched at the necessary for me operational parameter, or gain.

It looks like that with DHT tube it is even worth. I measured the 2A3 and 6A3 that I have and they are so much off the specks what that it is not even funny. When I buy Russian 6C33C then they measure whatever they want then it is fine as they cost nothing. Those DHT tune are expensive but the same crap quality wise – very said. Looking at this I might understand Lamm who sell 6C33C for $100 per tube, assuring it compliance with specs.

I was bitching about it before but the more I think about it the more I released that ether I do not get it of the other people do not get it. People buy and sell alder tube and give to each other the mutual conductance number presuming then it has any objective indication about the health of a tube. However, I feel that it has absolutely no universal value. Most of the tubes tests have AV on filaments that make those testers hardly usable for tube testing. If you drop testing signal from grind of the DHT and try to recalibrate your GM measurement to zero without the signal then your zero will be in respect to AC asymmetry of your filament, even if you externally balance filament. If so, then the GM measurement of any DH tube in our convertibles tubes tester would be the GM of the tube + the residual noise of the tube from AC modulations. Since no one I ever heard talks seriously about objective measurement AC modulations (even if the DC is use on filaments then the heaters tens are not symmetrical and need to be balanced) on the tube testers then I doubt that the Gm numbers that we get from the tube testers are very meaningful. The tube testers would allow to monitor the warring of the same tube with time but if I say that one DHT tube on my tester has GM higher then another DHT tube on another tester then it hardly mean anything. So, if people sell you a DH tube and claim certain numbers of it’s mutual conductance of grid emission then it is not so absurdish idea to look at those numbers skeptical.

The Cat

Rerurn to Romy the Cat's Site