|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
05-28-2026
|
Available in English translation
|
|
|
|
Posted by rowuk on
05-29-2026
|
|
The video deals with specific stimuli but how do we quantify what must be present in a rhythm or melody or harmony? What about discordant music? What about the speed, the register being played. What about pop music that repeats simple patterns?
|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
05-29-2026
|
|
So, since people are working with and developing inate (musical) abilities, a person simply has more or less to work with going in, and they are likely to have more or less inclination to work with it, as well. Hardly casts shade on the idea of birds of a feather, but does explain why "some people will never get it", "it" being any one or combination of the 3 pillars. This displaces but does not seem to negate vivid imagination, which I experienced as a child.
|
|
|
|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
05-29-2026
|
|
I know that this guy was working or on analyzing some things that I had tremendous interest and never understanding. Well I understand it but I do not know why it is happening and I always was looking for some kind of biological markers which would be responsible for this. If we have a sequence of the nods and we execute them in different tonality the perceptional meaning of the sequence completely change for audience. It is universally known and acknowledged phenomena but I never heard explanation why which would convince me. I think somebody like professor Teplov would be right person to tackle it. Only God knows if it has psychological or biological reasoning.
|
|