|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
03-06-2025
|
Thanks NBC. Nice primer on speaker/amp interface. This is probably more than most people want to know about how much power is actually required to get fairly certain measured response from speakers, also some properties required for "linear performance" from the drivers, themselves over the course of such a test. Of course, a whole lot depends on the actual topology and in-system performance of both speaker drivers (including their implementations) and real world amplifiers. Of course this does not say anything about high-demands Music Listening, but it does provide some insight into the root, inner workings of the power transfer between speakers and amps. I think it's fair to say that most drivers and amps are not designed and proofed with these simple facts in mind, let alone re-proofed with high-demands listening.
https://excelsior-audio.com/Publications/Loudspeaker_Target_SPL_and_Amplifier_Size.pdf
Best regards,
Paul S
|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
03-07-2025
|
NBC, I am not an SPL (or statistics) freak, rather I am a Music via hi-fi freak. I don't want my Music playback compromised by limitations that spoil the Music for me. I have found plenty of drivers that sound great "to a point" that I found "limiting", just as I have found many (most...) SPL-capable drivers are limited in terms of musical expression. I actually value wide-ranging Musical Expression more than extreme rote SPL, but I have found there are times when I've had to give up something to get something else, aka compromise.
Best regards,
Paul S
|
|
|
|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
03-18-2025
|
|
N.B.C. , it was brought to my attention by the site\s members that there is something wrong with you and your posts, 17 of18 of them are completely not relevant to the subject of this site. I dropped all your posts and left one that is marginally relevant. If you keep posting irrelevant garbage again I will delete your account.
|
|
|
|
Posted by N.B.C. on
03-18-2025
|
Hi Romy,
I have been reading your website views since the inception and prior. I Understand the actual [scope of focus] you painstakingly described over a period of years for the greater good of the natural evolutionary GSC Forum ~discussions~ as you see it.
Warm Regards,
N.B.C.
XJ-500. ; )
M's Factory
|
|
|
|
Posted by Edgar= on
03-18-2025
|
 N.B.C. wrote: |
Hi Romy,
I have been reading your website views since the inception and prior. |
|
How does one read a site prior to its inception? This is even more mysterious than reverb injection....
|
|