|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
12-31-2024
|
Happy New Year folks!
Romy The Cat
|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
12-31-2024
|
OK, guess I'm on the hook. Nice that you are trying to stay rigorous; I probably wouldn't, at least in these early stages. Can you say which part or parts of the playback you can change without changing the Orgone? Are you starting with CDs? Would it work with LPs? Does it work playing mono through a transistor radio speaker? Would it work if you recorded "that" playback with your phone and I heard that via YouTube? Of course I am trying to ascribe the Orgone.
Best regards,
Paul S
|
|
|
|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
12-31-2024
|
|
Paull, I'm not the type of the person who seriously cares about influence of argon to audio or impact of the torsion fields to sound reproduction. I rather deal with normal and understandable, at least to me parameters. I am perfectly comfortable with made a different forms of exotirisms, and I actually subscribe some of them but I do not put myself in a position when I feel that I might manage them. Well, there was many years ago an experience in my life when I actually I was able to do it but it has absolutely nothing to do with Audio.
|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
12-31-2024
|
Of course I am kidding about Orgone being the undefined element, and we both know what "it" isn't. I am just eager to know what "it" IS, where this quality originates, what is critical to it, what (if any) part(s) is(are) essential.
Paul S
|
|
|
|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
12-31-2024
|
|
This is not a laughable matter, Paul. I can clearly see my idea of X amplification hit the market as Adio unbtainium accelerator and that some kind of another audio pimp is going to write a review in Steriophile, cleaning that it was the best performance of John Cage's 4'33 he ever hurt during his pathetic 45 years of experience.
|
|
|
|
Posted by Paul S on
12-31-2024
|
Sorry, but I think this is likely now even if you bide your time with the "reveal". The same cast of a-holes is always ready to exploit the credulity of the "masses". It is certainly NOT your fault that the Commodity Wing of audio jumps on any new idea with a "marketable BS version". Once word gets out I would be pleased if that does not happen, also surprised...
Paul S.
|
|
|
|
Posted by Romy the Cat on
12-31-2024
|
|
This is actually is very interesting subject. I am not insisting that what I have discovered has any commercial potentials or any practical potential for a majority of public however, if it does I'm very clearly can see that what I have expressed above will undoubtedly exploited by the industry pimps. Even this little approach that I mentioned most likely will be used up for the most "advanced" reviewers who clearly feel that more or less sensible audio practitioners recognize i that the industry marketing efforts are revolting garbage. Is that industry moved very far away from beginning of the seventies when all those folks like Parson and the rest people from that time had some beliefs, integrity and sincerely would like to contribute their efforts into customer advocacy and to push the envelope of availabilities a little further. I wasn't around that time but I heard the stories. Since then industry got converted into extremely pathetic crowd pleasing exploring lower common denominator of audio intellectualism. The very same people who act today like peacocks with the flower tails might very well recognized my concept of X amplification and moderation of underwear transparency as a new way to sell garbage to gullible fools who are in desperate needs to be fooled
|
|